[PATCH] drm/xe/exec: Fix minor bug related to xe_sync_entry_cleanup

Matthew Brost matthew.brost at intel.com
Thu Jul 11 20:50:34 UTC 2024


On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 01:45:52PM -0700, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
> Increment num_syncs after xe_sync_entry_parse() is successful to ensure
> the xe_sync_entry_cleanup() logic under "err_syncs" label works correctly.
>

Patch LGTM. A couple of nits though.

Fixes tag?
 
> Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> index 2d72cdec3a0b..95c0b21096f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> @@ -156,8 +156,8 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
>  
>  	vm = q->vm;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < args->num_syncs; i++) {
> -		err = xe_sync_entry_parse(xe, xef, &syncs[num_syncs++],
> +	for (i = 0; i < args->num_syncs; i++, num_syncs++) {

How about?

'for (num_syncs = 0; num_syncs < args->num_syncs; num_syncs++) {'

This is what we do in xe_vm.c.

Matt

> +		err = xe_sync_entry_parse(xe, xef, &syncs[i],
>  					  &syncs_user[i], SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_EXEC |
>  					  (xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm) ?
>  					   SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_LR_MODE : 0));
> -- 
> 2.41.0
> 


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list