[PATCH 0/6] Move HuC and GSC FW defs for LNL and BMG to drm-xe-next

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Thu Jul 25 18:05:12 UTC 2024


On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 09:00:57AM GMT, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>
>
>On 7/24/2024 9:48 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 05:32:17PM GMT, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>>>The FW defines are currently in the for-ci branch because the FW blobs
>>>weren't ready to be officially published. Now that we have updated HuC
>>>and GSC blobs that are ready to be sent to linux-firmware, we can remove
>>>the defines from the for-ci branch and add them to drm-xe-next.
>>>
>>>Note that the 3 reverts are not meant to be merged, they're there to
>>>indicate the removal of those patches from the for-ci branch. Only the
>>>latter 3 patches are meant to be merged.
>>>
>>>Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>>>Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
>>
>>not a huge fan of UFC, but the first thing that came to mind when I saw
>>this was the catchphrase "iiiiiiiit's tiiime" :) Although I still miss
>>GuC in the series, hopefully we can get it soon.
>>
>>If CI is happy, I'm happy with this.
>>
>>Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>>
>>It would be good to note, in the cover letter, where the firmware blobs
>>currently are (the commit in drm/firmware containing them) and the
>>status for sending this to upstream linux-firmware.
>>
>>AFAICS https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/firmware/-/commits/intel-staging?ref_type=heads
>>up to commit 0690b69dc20da6d096450faa0c256f6896ff8365 has these 3 blobs.
>>Can you share the plan to send them to linux-firmware? Is this going to
>>happen just after having the CI results?
>
>I was planning to wait for the GuC binaries to be ready first and then 
>send a single PR to linux-firmware with all the blobs, which means 
>sending the PR either late this week or early next week. Note that we 
>usually send the PR after the patches have been merged for 1-2 days, 
>so this would be in line with that.
>
>CI is happy, so let me know if you prefer me to hold until we're ready 
>with all the binaries, otherwise I'll go ahead and merge.

nops, we still have some time before I send the pull request to
drm-next, so we are fine. Please go ahead and merge.

thanks
Lucas De Marchi

>
>Daniele
>
>>
>>
>>thanks
>>Lucas De Marchi
>>
>>>
>>>Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (6):
>>> Revert "drm/xe/huc: Define BMG HuC"
>>> Revert "drm/xe/gsc: define GSC FW for LNL"
>>> Revert "drm/xe/huc: Define LNL HuC"
>>> drm/xe/huc: Define HuC binary for LNL
>>> drm/xe/gsc: Define GSC binary for LNL
>>> drm/xe/huc: Define HuC binary for BMG
>>>
>>>drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_uc_fw.c | 6 +++---
>>>1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>2.43.0
>>>
>


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list