[PATCH] drm/xe/guc: Request max GT freq during resume

Michal Wajdeczko michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Mon Jun 3 15:28:04 UTC 2024



On 31.05.2024 23:42, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> We already request max freq in the load path, moving it
> to __xe_guc_upload will ensure this speeds up GuC load in
> the resume path as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> index f7886c00af01..63e1b685bd4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
> @@ -694,6 +694,9 @@ static int __xe_guc_upload(struct xe_guc *guc)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	/* Raise GT freq to speed up HuC/GuC load */
> +	xe_guc_pc_init_early(&guc->pc);

maybe it's just me, but usually we were using _init_early() name suffix
for functions with some early, one-time, likely software-only
initialization, while here this xe_guc_pc_init_early() seems to be doing
something else and now it could even be called many times

maybe it should be split/renamed to xe_guc_pc_boost() or something?

> +
>  	guc_write_params(guc);
>  	guc_prepare_xfer(guc);
>  
> @@ -779,9 +782,6 @@ int xe_guc_min_load_for_hwconfig(struct xe_guc *guc)
>  
>  	xe_guc_ads_populate_minimal(&guc->ads);
>  
> -	/* Raise GT freq to speed up HuC/GuC load */
> -	xe_guc_pc_init_early(&guc->pc);
> -
>  	ret = __xe_guc_upload(guc);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list