[PATCH v3 1/3] drm/xe: Cleanup force wake registers bit definitions
Ghimiray, Himal Prasad
himal.prasad.ghimiray at intel.com
Wed Jun 5 17:44:48 UTC 2024
On 05-06-2024 22:58, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 03:20:03PM +0530, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
>> - Remove unused bit definitions.
>> - Driver uses BIT(0) for waking/sleeping the domain and since the
>> registers are masked respective mask bit BIT(16) needs to be set. Use
>> defines for these bits and use them in domain initialization.
>>
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>> Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar at intel.com>
>> Suggested-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray at intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar at intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h | 8 +++++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
>> index d09b2473259f..47c26c37608d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
>> @@ -487,9 +487,11 @@
>> ((ccs) << ((cslice) * CCS_MODE_CSLICE_WIDTH))
>>
>> #define FORCEWAKE_ACK_GT XE_REG(0x130044)
>> -#define FORCEWAKE_KERNEL BIT(0)
>> -#define FORCEWAKE_USER BIT(1)
>> -#define FORCEWAKE_KERNEL_FALLBACK BIT(15)
>> +
>> +/* Applicable for all FORCEWAKE_DOMAIN and FORCEWAKE_ACK_DOMAIN regs */
>> +#define FORCEWAKE_KERNEL 0
>> +#define FORCEWAKE_MT(bit) BIT(bit)
>> +#define FORCEWAKE_MT_MASK(bit) BIT((bit) + 16)
>>
>> #define MTL_MEDIA_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS XE_REG(0x138030)
>> #define MTL_MEDIA_MC6 XE_REG(0x138048)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
>> index 9bbe8a5040da..54279c3814af 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
>> @@ -52,13 +52,15 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_gt(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake *fw)
>> XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT,
>> FORCEWAKE_GT,
>> FORCEWAKE_ACK_GT_MTL,
>> - BIT(0), BIT(16));
>> + FORCEWAKE_MT(FORCEWAKE_KERNEL),
>> + FORCEWAKE_MT_MASK(FORCEWAKE_KERNEL));
>
> hmm.... looking at this now I believe it would be better to just pass the FORCEWAKE_KERNEL bit
> number as param and then use the MT and MT_MASK inside the domain_init function...
Hmm makes sense. Do we expect to use any other bit apart from
FORCEWAKE_KERNEL? If not, how about not passing FORCEWAKE_KERNEL at all
and instead directly using MT and MT_MASK inside the domain_init function?
>
> but up you... my rv-b remains whatever you decide.
>
>> } else {
>> domain_init(&fw->domains[XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT],
>> XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT,
>> FORCEWAKE_GT,
>> FORCEWAKE_ACK_GT,
>> - BIT(0), BIT(16));
>> + FORCEWAKE_MT(FORCEWAKE_KERNEL),
>> + FORCEWAKE_MT_MASK(FORCEWAKE_KERNEL));
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -74,7 +76,8 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake *fw)
>> XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER,
>> FORCEWAKE_RENDER,
>> FORCEWAKE_ACK_RENDER,
>> - BIT(0), BIT(16));
>> + FORCEWAKE_MT(FORCEWAKE_KERNEL),
>> + FORCEWAKE_MT_MASK(FORCEWAKE_KERNEL));
>>
>> for (i = XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS0, j = 0; i <= XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS7; ++i, ++j) {
>> if (!(gt->info.engine_mask & BIT(i)))
>> @@ -84,7 +87,8 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake *fw)
>> XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX0 + j,
>> FORCEWAKE_MEDIA_VDBOX(j),
>> FORCEWAKE_ACK_MEDIA_VDBOX(j),
>> - BIT(0), BIT(16));
>> + FORCEWAKE_MT(FORCEWAKE_KERNEL),
>> + FORCEWAKE_MT_MASK(FORCEWAKE_KERNEL));
>> }
>>
>> for (i = XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS0, j = 0; i <= XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS3; ++i, ++j) {
>> @@ -95,7 +99,8 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake *fw)
>> XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX0 + j,
>> FORCEWAKE_MEDIA_VEBOX(j),
>> FORCEWAKE_ACK_MEDIA_VEBOX(j),
>> - BIT(0), BIT(16));
>> + FORCEWAKE_MT(FORCEWAKE_KERNEL),
>> + FORCEWAKE_MT_MASK(FORCEWAKE_KERNEL));
>> }
>>
>> if (gt->info.engine_mask & BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_GSCCS0))
>> @@ -103,7 +108,8 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake *fw)
>> XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GSC,
>> FORCEWAKE_GSC,
>> FORCEWAKE_ACK_GSC,
>> - BIT(0), BIT(16));
>> + FORCEWAKE_MT(FORCEWAKE_KERNEL),
>> + FORCEWAKE_MT_MASK(FORCEWAKE_KERNEL));
>> }
>>
>> static void domain_wake(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain)
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list