[PATCH 1/4] drm/xe: Prefer GT oriented messages in xe_force_wake.c
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Mon Jun 10 19:44:51 UTC 2024
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 08:37:54PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> If possible, we should prefer xe_gt_notice() over drm_notice().
> While at it, undo line split of fw_to_gt() function signature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c | 20 ++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> index b2d385daff4b..2497f0f65aa0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> @@ -10,22 +10,16 @@
> #include "regs/xe_gt_regs.h"
> #include "regs/xe_reg_defs.h"
> #include "xe_gt.h"
> +#include "xe_gt_printk.h"
> #include "xe_mmio.h"
>
> #define XE_FORCE_WAKE_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS 50
>
> -static struct xe_gt *
> -fw_to_gt(struct xe_force_wake *fw)
> +static struct xe_gt *fw_to_gt(struct xe_force_wake *fw)
> {
> return fw->gt;
> }
>
> -static struct xe_device *
> -fw_to_xe(struct xe_force_wake *fw)
> -{
> - return gt_to_xe(fw_to_gt(fw));
> -}
> -
> static void domain_init(struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain,
> enum xe_force_wake_domain_id id,
> struct xe_reg reg, struct xe_reg ack)
> @@ -135,7 +129,6 @@ static int domain_sleep_wait(struct xe_gt *gt,
> int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> enum xe_force_wake_domains domains)
> {
> - struct xe_device *xe = fw_to_xe(fw);
> struct xe_gt *gt = fw_to_gt(fw);
> struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain;
> enum xe_force_wake_domains tmp, woken = 0;
> @@ -153,8 +146,8 @@ int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> ret = domain_wake_wait(gt, domain);
> ret2 |= ret;
> if (ret)
> - drm_notice(&xe->drm, "Force wake domain (%d) failed to ack wake, ret=%d\n",
> - domain->id, ret);
> + xe_gt_notice(gt, "Force wake domain (%d) failed to ack wake, ret=%d\n",
> + domain->id, ret);
> }
> fw->awake_domains |= woken;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fw->lock, flags);
> @@ -165,7 +158,6 @@ int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> enum xe_force_wake_domains domains)
> {
> - struct xe_device *xe = fw_to_xe(fw);
> struct xe_gt *gt = fw_to_gt(fw);
> struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain;
> enum xe_force_wake_domains tmp, sleep = 0;
> @@ -183,8 +175,8 @@ int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> ret = domain_sleep_wait(gt, domain);
> ret2 |= ret;
> if (ret)
> - drm_notice(&xe->drm, "Force wake domain (%d) failed to ack sleep, ret=%d\n",
> - domain->id, ret);
> + xe_gt_notice(gt, "Force wake domain (%d) failed to ack sleep, ret=%d\n",
> + domain->id, ret);
> }
> fw->awake_domains &= ~sleep;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fw->lock, flags);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list