[PATCH 5/9] drm/xe/vf: Don't initialize OA if VF

[Michal Wajdeczko]

On 20.06.2024 00:10, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:56:32 -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:45:53 -0700, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>>>
>>> We don't support Observation Architecture on the VF device.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
>>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>>> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c | 4 ++++
>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
>>> index 34206e0b6a08..f54a97954452 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
>>> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>>>  #include "xe_perf.h"
>>>  #include "xe_pm.h"
>>>  #include "xe_sched_job.h"
>>> +#include "xe_sriov.h"
>>>
>>>  #define DEFAULT_POLL_FREQUENCY_HZ 200
>>>  #define DEFAULT_POLL_PERIOD_NS (NSEC_PER_SEC / DEFAULT_POLL_FREQUENCY_HZ)
>>> @@ -2385,6 +2386,9 @@ int xe_oa_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> 	if (XE_WARN_ON(!xe_device_uc_enabled(xe)) || XE_WARN_ON(GRAPHICS_VER(xe) < 12))
>>> 		return 0;
>>>
>>> +	if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +
>>
>> Do we want to add XE_WARN_ON's
> 
> Though maybe not, if we don't want to see the WARN_ON when loading the VF driver...

yep, we don't want WARN on every VF boot

and TBH IMO above XE_WARN_ON are all wrong, as:

- why WARN if someone used legal param xe.force_execlist ?
  we can rely on existing drm_dbg() when someone will attempt to use oa

- why WARN if Xe driver by design does not support gen < 12 ?
  if you want to be paranoid just add xe_assert() to document that

> 
>> or combine this if statement with the previous one?
>>
>> In any case:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>

thanks

>>
>>
>>> 	oa->xe = xe;
>>> 	oa->oa_formats = oa_formats;
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.43.0
>>>