[PATCH] drm/xe/huc: Use GT oriented error messages in xe_huc.c
Michal Wajdeczko
michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Fri Jun 21 18:12:48 UTC 2024
On 21.06.2024 19:47, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 07:25:22PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>> If applicable, we prefer GT oriented dmesg messages. Update all
>> HuC related messages and use more user friendly error codes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
>> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_huc.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_huc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_huc.c
>> index c88761fe31c9..bec4366e5513 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_huc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_huc.c
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>> #include "xe_force_wake.h"
>> #include "xe_gsc_submit.h"
>> #include "xe_gt.h"
>> +#include "xe_gt_printk.h"
>> #include "xe_guc.h"
>> #include "xe_map.h"
>> #include "xe_mmio.h"
>> @@ -107,7 +108,7 @@ int xe_huc_init(struct xe_huc *huc)
>> return 0;
>>
>> out:
>> - drm_err(&xe->drm, "HuC init failed with %d", ret);
>> + xe_gt_err(gt, "HuC: initialization failed: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
>
> Why the ERR_PTR change? I think this make everything less clear. Or does
> %pe convert this back to an easily readable value?
yes, instead of raw error value:
"... [drm] *ERROR* HuC init failed with -5"
it will print error name:
"... [drm] *ERROR* GT0: HuC: initialization failed: -EIO"
see [1] for more details
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/lib/Kconfig.debug#L191
>
> Matt
>
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -195,14 +196,14 @@ static int huc_auth_via_gsccs(struct xe_huc *huc)
>> } while (--retry && err == -EBUSY);
>>
>> if (err) {
>> - drm_err(&xe->drm, "failed to submit GSC request to auth: %d\n", err);
>> + xe_gt_err(gt, "HuC: failed to submit GSC request to auth: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(err));
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> err = xe_gsc_read_out_header(xe, &pkt->vmap, PXP43_HUC_AUTH_INOUT_SIZE,
>> sizeof(struct pxp43_huc_auth_out), &rd_offset);
>> if (err) {
>> - drm_err(&xe->drm, "HuC: invalid GSC reply for auth (err=%d)\n", err);
>> + xe_gt_err(gt, "HuC: invalid GSC reply for auth: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(err));
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -213,7 +214,7 @@ static int huc_auth_via_gsccs(struct xe_huc *huc)
>> */
>> out_status = huc_auth_msg_rd(xe, &pkt->vmap, rd_offset, header.status);
>> if (out_status != PXP_STATUS_SUCCESS && out_status != PXP_STATUS_OP_NOT_PERMITTED) {
>> - drm_err(&xe->drm, "auth failed with GSC error = 0x%x\n", out_status);
>> + xe_gt_err(gt, "HuC: authentication failed with GSC error = %#x\n", out_status);
>> return -EIO;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -242,7 +243,6 @@ bool xe_huc_is_authenticated(struct xe_huc *huc, enum xe_huc_auth_types type)
>>
>> int xe_huc_auth(struct xe_huc *huc, enum xe_huc_auth_types type)
>> {
>> - struct xe_device *xe = huc_to_xe(huc);
>> struct xe_gt *gt = huc_to_gt(huc);
>> struct xe_guc *guc = huc_to_guc(huc);
>> int ret;
>> @@ -272,26 +272,26 @@ int xe_huc_auth(struct xe_huc *huc, enum xe_huc_auth_types type)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> if (ret) {
>> - drm_err(&xe->drm, "Failed to trigger HuC auth via %s: %d\n",
>> - huc_auth_modes[type].name, ret);
>> + xe_gt_err(gt, "HuC: failed to trigger auth via %s: %pe\n",
>> + huc_auth_modes[type].name, ERR_PTR(ret));
>> goto fail;
>> }
>>
>> ret = xe_mmio_wait32(gt, huc_auth_modes[type].reg, huc_auth_modes[type].val,
>> huc_auth_modes[type].val, 100000, NULL, false);
>> if (ret) {
>> - drm_err(&xe->drm, "HuC: Firmware not verified %d\n", ret);
>> + xe_gt_err(gt, "HuC: firmware not verified: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
>> goto fail;
>> }
>>
>> xe_uc_fw_change_status(&huc->fw, XE_UC_FIRMWARE_RUNNING);
>> - drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "HuC authenticated via %s\n", huc_auth_modes[type].name);
>> + xe_gt_dbg(gt, "HuC: authenticated via %s\n", huc_auth_modes[type].name);
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> fail:
>> - drm_err(&xe->drm, "HuC: Auth via %s failed: %d\n",
>> - huc_auth_modes[type].name, ret);
>> + xe_gt_err(gt, "HuC: authentication via %s failed: %pe\n",
>> + huc_auth_modes[type].name, ERR_PTR(ret));
>> xe_uc_fw_change_status(&huc->fw, XE_UC_FIRMWARE_LOAD_FAIL);
>>
>> return ret;
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list