[PATCH v5 4/7] drm/xe: Convert multiple bind ops into single job

Matthew Brost matthew.brost at intel.com
Wed Jun 26 19:27:43 UTC 2024


On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 05:39:45PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 26/06/2024 17:12, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 03:03:41PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > > On 26/06/2024 01:39, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > > This aligns with the uAPI of an array of binds or single bind that
> > > > results in multiple GPUVA ops to be considered a single atomic
> > > > operations.
> > > > 
> > > > The implemenation is roughly:
> > > > - xe_vma_ops is a list of xe_vma_op (GPUVA op)
> > > > - each xe_vma_op resolves to 0-3 PT ops
> > > > - xe_vma_ops creates a single job
> > > > - if at any point during binding a failure occurs, xe_vma_ops contains
> > > >     the information necessary unwind the PT and VMA (GPUVA) state
> > > > 
> > > > v2:
> > > >    - add missing dma-resv slot reservation (CI, testing)
> > > > v4:
> > > >    - Fix TLB invalidation (Paulo)
> > > >    - Add missing xe_sched_job_last_fence_add/test_dep check (Inspection)
> > > > v5:
> > > >    - Invert i, j usage (Matthew Auld)
> > > >    - Add helper to test and add job dep (Matthew Auld)
> > > >    - Return on anything but -ETIME for cpu bind (Matthew Auld)
> > > >    - Return -ENOBUFS if suballoc of BB fails due to size (Matthew Auld)
> > > >    - s/do/Do (Matthew Auld)
> > > >    - Add missing comma (Matthew Auld)
> > > >    - Do not assign return value to xe_range_fence_insert (Matthew Auld)
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h |    2 +
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c  |  306 ++++-----
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.h  |   32 +-
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c       | 1102 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.h       |   14 +-
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt_types.h |   36 +
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c       |  519 +++-----------
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h       |    2 +
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h |   45 +-
> > > >    9 files changed, 1036 insertions(+), 1022 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h
> > > > index 86422e113d39..02d68873558a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h
> > > > @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ struct xe_bo {
> > > >    #endif
> > > >    	/** @freed: List node for delayed put. */
> > > >    	struct llist_node freed;
> > > > +	/** @update_index: Update index if PT BO */
> > > > +	int update_index;
> > > >    	/** @created: Whether the bo has passed initial creation */
> > > >    	bool created;
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> > > > index af62783d34ac..160bfcd510ae 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> > > > @@ -1125,6 +1125,7 @@ struct dma_fence *xe_migrate_clear(struct xe_migrate *m,
> > > >    }
> > > >    static void write_pgtable(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_bb *bb, u64 ppgtt_ofs,
> > > > +			  const struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_op *pt_op,
> > > >    			  const struct xe_vm_pgtable_update *update,
> > > >    			  struct xe_migrate_pt_update *pt_update)
> > > >    {
> > > > @@ -1159,8 +1160,12 @@ static void write_pgtable(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_bb *bb, u64 ppgtt_ofs,
> > > >    		bb->cs[bb->len++] = MI_STORE_DATA_IMM | MI_SDI_NUM_QW(chunk);
> > > >    		bb->cs[bb->len++] = lower_32_bits(addr);
> > > >    		bb->cs[bb->len++] = upper_32_bits(addr);
> > > > -		ops->populate(pt_update, tile, NULL, bb->cs + bb->len, ofs, chunk,
> > > > -			      update);
> > > > +		if (pt_op->bind)
> > > > +			ops->populate(pt_update, tile, NULL, bb->cs + bb->len,
> > > > +				      ofs, chunk, update);
> > > > +		else
> > > > +			ops->clear(pt_update, tile, NULL, bb->cs + bb->len,
> > > > +				   ofs, chunk, update);
> > > >    		bb->len += chunk * 2;
> > > >    		ofs += chunk;
> > > > @@ -1185,114 +1190,58 @@ struct migrate_test_params {
> > > >    static struct dma_fence *
> > > >    xe_migrate_update_pgtables_cpu(struct xe_migrate *m,
> > > > -			       struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_bo *bo,
> > > > -			       const struct  xe_vm_pgtable_update *updates,
> > > > -			       u32 num_updates, bool wait_vm,
> > > >    			       struct xe_migrate_pt_update *pt_update)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	XE_TEST_DECLARE(struct migrate_test_params *test =
> > > >    			to_migrate_test_params
> > > >    			(xe_cur_kunit_priv(XE_TEST_LIVE_MIGRATE));)
> > > >    	const struct xe_migrate_pt_update_ops *ops = pt_update->ops;
> > > > -	struct dma_fence *fence;
> > > > +	struct xe_vm *vm = pt_update->vops->vm;
> > > > +	struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_ops *pt_update_ops =
> > > > +		&pt_update->vops->pt_update_ops[pt_update->tile_id];
> > > >    	int err;
> > > > -	u32 i;
> > > > +	u32 i, j;
> > > >    	if (XE_TEST_ONLY(test && test->force_gpu))
> > > >    		return ERR_PTR(-ETIME);
> > > > -	if (bo && !dma_resv_test_signaled(bo->ttm.base.resv,
> > > > -					  DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL))
> > > > -		return ERR_PTR(-ETIME);
> > > > -
> > > > -	if (wait_vm && !dma_resv_test_signaled(xe_vm_resv(vm),
> > > > -					       DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP))
> > > > -		return ERR_PTR(-ETIME);
> > > > -
> > > >    	if (ops->pre_commit) {
> > > >    		pt_update->job = NULL;
> > > >    		err = ops->pre_commit(pt_update);
> > > >    		if (err)
> > > >    			return ERR_PTR(err);
> > > >    	}
> > > > -	for (i = 0; i < num_updates; i++) {
> > > > -		const struct xe_vm_pgtable_update *update = &updates[i];
> > > > -
> > > > -		ops->populate(pt_update, m->tile, &update->pt_bo->vmap, NULL,
> > > > -			      update->ofs, update->qwords, update);
> > > > -	}
> > > > -
> > > > -	if (vm) {
> > > > -		trace_xe_vm_cpu_bind(vm);
> > > > -		xe_device_wmb(vm->xe);
> > > > -	}
> > > > -
> > > > -	fence = dma_fence_get_stub();
> > > > -
> > > > -	return fence;
> > > > -}
> > > > -
> > > > -static bool no_in_syncs(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_exec_queue *q,
> > > > -			struct xe_sync_entry *syncs, u32 num_syncs)
> > > > -{
> > > > -	struct dma_fence *fence;
> > > > -	int i;
> > > > -	for (i = 0; i < num_syncs; i++) {
> > > > -		fence = syncs[i].fence;
> > > > -
> > > > -		if (fence && !test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT,
> > > > -				       &fence->flags))
> > > > -			return false;
> > > > -	}
> > > > -	if (q) {
> > > > -		fence = xe_exec_queue_last_fence_get(q, vm);
> > > > -		if (!test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags)) {
> > > > -			dma_fence_put(fence);
> > > > -			return false;
> > > > +	for (i = 0; i < pt_update_ops->num_ops; ++i) {
> > > > +		const struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_op *pt_op =
> > > > +			&pt_update_ops->ops[i];
> > > > +
> > > > +		for (j = 0; j < pt_op->num_entries; j++) {
> > > > +			const struct xe_vm_pgtable_update *update =
> > > > +				&pt_op->entries[j];
> > > > +
> > > > +			if (pt_op->bind)
> > > > +				ops->populate(pt_update, m->tile,
> > > > +					      &update->pt_bo->vmap, NULL,
> > > > +					      update->ofs, update->qwords,
> > > > +					      update);
> > > > +			else
> > > > +				ops->clear(pt_update, m->tile,
> > > > +					   &update->pt_bo->vmap, NULL,
> > > > +					   update->ofs, update->qwords, update);
> > > >    		}
> > > > -		dma_fence_put(fence);
> > > >    	}
> > > > -	return true;
> > > > +	trace_xe_vm_cpu_bind(vm);
> > > > +	xe_device_wmb(vm->xe);
> > > > +
> > > > +	return dma_fence_get_stub();
> > > >    }
> > > > -/**
> > > > - * xe_migrate_update_pgtables() - Pipelined page-table update
> > > > - * @m: The migrate context.
> > > > - * @vm: The vm we'll be updating.
> > > > - * @bo: The bo whose dma-resv we will await before updating, or NULL if userptr.
> > > > - * @q: The exec queue to be used for the update or NULL if the default
> > > > - * migration engine is to be used.
> > > > - * @updates: An array of update descriptors.
> > > > - * @num_updates: Number of descriptors in @updates.
> > > > - * @syncs: Array of xe_sync_entry to await before updating. Note that waits
> > > > - * will block the engine timeline.
> > > > - * @num_syncs: Number of entries in @syncs.
> > > > - * @pt_update: Pointer to a struct xe_migrate_pt_update, which contains
> > > > - * pointers to callback functions and, if subclassed, private arguments to
> > > > - * those.
> > > > - *
> > > > - * Perform a pipelined page-table update. The update descriptors are typically
> > > > - * built under the same lock critical section as a call to this function. If
> > > > - * using the default engine for the updates, they will be performed in the
> > > > - * order they grab the job_mutex. If different engines are used, external
> > > > - * synchronization is needed for overlapping updates to maintain page-table
> > > > - * consistency. Note that the meaing of "overlapping" is that the updates
> > > > - * touch the same page-table, which might be a higher-level page-directory.
> > > > - * If no pipelining is needed, then updates may be performed by the cpu.
> > > > - *
> > > > - * Return: A dma_fence that, when signaled, indicates the update completion.
> > > > - */
> > > > -struct dma_fence *
> > > > -xe_migrate_update_pgtables(struct xe_migrate *m,
> > > > -			   struct xe_vm *vm,
> > > > -			   struct xe_bo *bo,
> > > > -			   struct xe_exec_queue *q,
> > > > -			   const struct xe_vm_pgtable_update *updates,
> > > > -			   u32 num_updates,
> > > > -			   struct xe_sync_entry *syncs, u32 num_syncs,
> > > > -			   struct xe_migrate_pt_update *pt_update)
> > > > +static struct dma_fence *
> > > > +__xe_migrate_update_pgtables(struct xe_migrate *m,
> > > > +			     struct xe_migrate_pt_update *pt_update,
> > > > +			     struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_ops *pt_update_ops)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	const struct xe_migrate_pt_update_ops *ops = pt_update->ops;
> > > >    	struct xe_tile *tile = m->tile;
> > > > @@ -1301,59 +1250,53 @@ xe_migrate_update_pgtables(struct xe_migrate *m,
> > > >    	struct xe_sched_job *job;
> > > >    	struct dma_fence *fence;
> > > >    	struct drm_suballoc *sa_bo = NULL;
> > > > -	struct xe_vma *vma = pt_update->vma;
> > > >    	struct xe_bb *bb;
> > > > -	u32 i, batch_size, ppgtt_ofs, update_idx, page_ofs = 0;
> > > > +	u32 i, j, batch_size = 0, ppgtt_ofs, update_idx, page_ofs = 0;
> > > > +	u32 num_updates = 0, current_update = 0;
> > > >    	u64 addr;
> > > >    	int err = 0;
> > > > -	bool usm = !q && xe->info.has_usm;
> > > > -	bool first_munmap_rebind = vma &&
> > > > -		vma->gpuva.flags & XE_VMA_FIRST_REBIND;
> > > > -	struct xe_exec_queue *q_override = !q ? m->q : q;
> > > > -	u16 pat_index = xe->pat.idx[XE_CACHE_WB];
> > > > +	bool is_migrate = pt_update_ops->q == m->q;
> > > > +	bool usm = is_migrate && xe->info.has_usm;
> > > > +
> > > > +	for (i = 0; i < pt_update_ops->num_ops; ++i) {
> > > > +		struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_op *pt_op = &pt_update_ops->ops[i];
> > > > +		struct xe_vm_pgtable_update *updates = pt_op->entries;
> > > > -	/* Use the CPU if no in syncs and engine is idle */
> > > > -	if (no_in_syncs(vm, q, syncs, num_syncs) && xe_exec_queue_is_idle(q_override)) {
> > > > -		fence =  xe_migrate_update_pgtables_cpu(m, vm, bo, updates,
> > > > -							num_updates,
> > > > -							first_munmap_rebind,
> > > > -							pt_update);
> > > > -		if (!IS_ERR(fence) || fence == ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN))
> > > > -			return fence;
> > > > +		num_updates += pt_op->num_entries;
> > > > +		for (j = 0; j < pt_op->num_entries; ++j) {
> > > > +			u32 num_cmds = DIV_ROUND_UP(updates[j].qwords, 0x1ff);
> > > 
> > > Why 0x1ff here? Should it not be MAX_PTE_PER_SDI? There is a failure in CI
> > > here: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-133034v5/shard-lnl-8/igt@xe_vm@mmap-style-bind-either-side-partial-split-page-hammer.html
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes it should be MAX_PTE_PER_SDI, copy paste error or perhaps this code
> > changed since my patch was originally authored. Will fix.
> > 
> > > Wondering if this is the cause? i.e we think we can fit more stores per
> > > MI_STORE_DATA_IMM, since write_pgtable() below is using MAX_PTE_PER_SDI and
> > > not 0x1ff?
> > 
> > Hmm, unsure. Will have to dig in on HW. The math to calculate batch_size
> > could be wrong somewhere else too.
> > 
> > > 
> > > > +
> > > > +			/* align noop + MI_STORE_DATA_IMM cmd prefix */
> > > > +			batch_size += 4 * num_cmds + updates[j].qwords * 2;
> > > > +		}
> > > >    	}
> > > >    	/* fixed + PTE entries */
> > > >    	if (IS_DGFX(xe))
> > > > -		batch_size = 2;
> > > > +		batch_size += 2;
> > > >    	else
> > > > -		batch_size = 6 + num_updates * 2;
> > > > -
> > > > -	for (i = 0; i < num_updates; i++) {
> > > > -		u32 num_cmds = DIV_ROUND_UP(updates[i].qwords, MAX_PTE_PER_SDI);
> > > > +		batch_size += 6 + num_updates * 2;
> > > > -		/* align noop + MI_STORE_DATA_IMM cmd prefix */
> > > > -		batch_size += 4 * num_cmds + updates[i].qwords * 2;
> > > > -	}
> > > > -
> > > > -	/*
> > > > -	 * XXX: Create temp bo to copy from, if batch_size becomes too big?
> > > > -	 *
> > > > -	 * Worst case: Sum(2 * (each lower level page size) + (top level page size))
> > > > -	 * Should be reasonably bound..
> > > > -	 */
> > > > -	xe_tile_assert(tile, batch_size < SZ_128K);
> > > > +	bb = xe_bb_new(gt, batch_size, usm);
> > > 
> > > So do we now validate that batch_size fits within the total pool size
> > > somewhere, to avoid triggering the warning in drm_suballoc_new? Did your igt
> > > not trigger the warning? Also the below check is not too late?
> > > 
> > 
> > I think the idea with xe_tile_assert is we should not expose asserts
> > which user space can trigger. e.g. When I run [1] we shouldn't see
> > asserts pop.
> > 
> > The below IGT passed so I think letting xe_bb_new fail and converting to
> > -ENOBUFS is correct.
> 
> There was no warning when running it? drm_suballoc_new() treats that as a
> programmer error and throws a full blown warning when returning EINVAL.
> Unless I'm missing something here, we have to do the check before.
> 

Ah, yes there is a warning. Let's move the check outside of xe_bb_new then.

Matt

> > 
> > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/135143/
> > > > +	if (IS_ERR(bb)) {
> > > > +		/*
> > > > +		 * BB to large, return -ENOBUFS indicating user should split
> > > > +		 * array of binds into smaller chunks.
> > > > +		 */
> > > > +		if (PTR_ERR(bb) == -EINVAL)
> > > > +			return ERR_PTR(-ENOBUFS);
> > > > -	bb = xe_bb_new(gt, batch_size, !q && xe->info.has_usm);
> > > > -	if (IS_ERR(bb))
> > > >    		return ERR_CAST(bb);
> > > > +	}
> > > >    	/* For sysmem PTE's, need to map them in our hole.. */
> > > >    	if (!IS_DGFX(xe)) {
> > > >    		ppgtt_ofs = NUM_KERNEL_PDE - 1;
> > > > -		if (q) {
> > > > -			xe_tile_assert(tile, num_updates <= NUM_VMUSA_WRITES_PER_UNIT);
> > > > +		if (!is_migrate) {
> > > > +			u32 num_units = DIV_ROUND_UP(num_updates,
> > > > +						     NUM_VMUSA_WRITES_PER_UNIT);
> > > > -			sa_bo = drm_suballoc_new(&m->vm_update_sa, 1,
> > > > +			sa_bo = drm_suballoc_new(&m->vm_update_sa, num_units,
> > > >    						 GFP_KERNEL, true, 0);
> > > 
> > > And maybe here also?
> > > 
> > 
> > Hmm, I think here we should also convert IS_ERR(sa_bo) to -ENOBUFS. Will
> > fix.
> > 
> > > >    			if (IS_ERR(sa_bo)) {
> > > >    				err = PTR_ERR(sa_bo);
> > > > @@ -1373,14 +1316,26 @@ xe_migrate_update_pgtables(struct xe_migrate *m,
> > > >    		bb->cs[bb->len++] = ppgtt_ofs * XE_PAGE_SIZE + page_ofs;
> > > >    		bb->cs[bb->len++] = 0; /* upper_32_bits */
> > > 
> > > Off camera this is doing:
> > > 
> > > b->cs[bb->len++] = MI_STORE_DATA_IMM | MI_SDI_NUM_QW(num_updates);
> > > 
> > > What are certain that num_updates still can be done with single command
> > > here?  Do we not need to break it up like we do with write_pgtable? If it's
> > 
> > The IGT assert from the CI failure will pop if we overun the allocated
> > batch buffer. So I think we are good on our commands fitting.
> 
> Ok, sounds good.
> 
> > 
> > We could potentially break this but kinda goes against the idea a single
> > job per IOCTL. Also I don't really want to overengineer this when we
> > have a planned UMD fallback path via returning -ENOBUFS and eventually
> > want to move to CPU binds and this entire problem just goes away.
> > 
> > Matt
> > 
> > > not an issue I think would be good to add an assert to ensure it fits?
> > > 
> > > <snip>


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list