[PATCH 5/9] drm/xe: Removing useless mem_access protection from runtime pm

Matthew Auld matthew.auld at intel.com
Tue Mar 5 10:22:42 UTC 2024


On 04/03/2024 18:21, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> This condition was always impossible. Likely the original
> idea was to only have an extra protection to exit resume if
> refcount was not zero, but ended up with a bad implementation.
> 
> Since it doesn't make sense, let's remove this extra usage of
> mem_access_ongoing, so we can proceed with killing mem_access
> helpers.
> 
> v2: Improve commit message to highlight it is impossible,
>      rather than stating it is not useful anymore (Matt).
> 
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list