[PATCH] drm/xe/gt: Remove redundant num_engine check
Michal Wajdeczko
michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Fri Mar 8 09:55:51 UTC 2024
On 08.03.2024 08:03, Tejas Upadhyay wrote:
> In __xe_gt_apply_ccs_mode num_engines will never be 0
> as it is already checked by parent function.
and that's why we are using xe_assert() instead of explicit checks, so
you can't say it's redundant
note that the purpose of xe_assert() inside one function is to enforce
the SLA for the caller who should be responsible for doing actual
runtime checks
>
> Fixes: 0d97ecce16bd ("drm/xe: Enable Fixed CCS mode setting")
> Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c
> index 529fc286cd06..2bbd7b203cc2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static void __xe_gt_apply_ccs_mode(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 num_engines)
>
> xe_assert(xe, xe_gt_ccs_mode_enabled(gt));
>
> - xe_assert(xe, num_engines && num_engines <= num_slices);
btw, instead of dropping num_engines condition completely this should be
rather split into two separate xe_asserts():
xe_assert(xe, num_engines);
xe_assert(xe, num_engines <= num_slices);
> + xe_assert(xe, num_engines <= num_slices);
> xe_assert(xe, !(num_slices % num_engines));
>
> /*
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list