[PATCH 2/3] drm/xe/vf: Remove lmtt->ops null check in xe_lmtt_estimate_pt_size
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Fri Mar 8 14:52:18 UTC 2024
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 10:06:50AM +0530, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
> In xe_lmtt_estimate_pt_size: Pointer is checked against null but then
> dereferenced anyway.
And what's the problem?
In the line below it access beyond this pointer, so it is a fair
case.
> Since xe_lmtt_init ensures lmtt->ops is populated
> remove the check.
With this in mind we could simply remove all the asserts in the code.
I believe that if someone introduced it here it is likely because
during some development or refactor this ended up being a problem
and want some earlier kind of warning with backtrace information.
>
> Reported by static analyzer.
Perhaps then replace with an
if (!lmtt->ops) {
drm_WARN(...);
return;
}
and/or mark the tool as a false positive?!
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lmtt.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lmtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lmtt.c
> index 0d7c5514e092..d6d75414bb99 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lmtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_lmtt.c
> @@ -487,7 +487,6 @@ u64 xe_lmtt_estimate_pt_size(struct xe_lmtt *lmtt, u64 size)
>
> lmtt_assert(lmtt, IS_SRIOV_PF(lmtt_to_xe(lmtt)));
> lmtt_assert(lmtt, IS_DGFX(lmtt_to_xe(lmtt)));
> - lmtt_assert(lmtt, lmtt->ops);
>
> pt_size = PAGE_ALIGN(lmtt->ops->lmtt_pte_size(level) *
> lmtt->ops->lmtt_pte_num(level));
> --
> 2.25.1
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list