[PATCH] drm/xe: Skip VMAs pin when requesting signal to the last XE_EXEC
Matthew Brost
matthew.brost at intel.com
Wed Mar 13 17:34:45 UTC 2024
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:13:18AM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Doing a XE_EXEC with num_batch_buffer == 0 makes signals passed as
> argument to be signaled when the last real XE_EXEC is completed.
> But to do that it was first pinning all VMAs in drm_gpuvm_exec_lock(),
> this patch remove this pinning as it is not required.
>
> This change also help Mesa implementing memory over-commiting recovery
> as it needs to unbind not needed VMAs when the whole VM can't fit
> in GPU memory but it can only do the unbiding when the last XE_EXEC
> is completed.
> So with this change Mesa can get the signal it want without getting
> out-of-memory errors.
>
> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> index 952496c6260df..826c8b3896725 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,29 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
> goto err_unlock_list;
> }
>
> + if (!args->num_batch_buffer) {
> + err = xe_vm_lock(vm, true);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_unlock_list;
> +
> + if (!xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm)) {
> + struct dma_fence *fence;
> +
> + fence = xe_sync_in_fence_get(syncs, num_syncs, q, vm);
> + if (IS_ERR(fence)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(fence);
> + goto err_unlock_list;
> + }
> + for (i = 0; i < num_syncs; i++)
> + xe_sync_entry_signal(&syncs[i], NULL, fence);
> + xe_exec_queue_last_fence_set(q, vm, fence);
> + dma_fence_put(fence);
> + }
> +
> + xe_vm_unlock(vm);
> + goto err_unlock_list;
> + }
> +
> vm_exec.vm = &vm->gpuvm;
> vm_exec.flags = DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT;
> if (xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm)) {
> @@ -254,24 +277,6 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
> goto err_exec;
> }
>
> - if (!args->num_batch_buffer) {
> - if (!xe_vm_in_lr_mode(vm)) {
> - struct dma_fence *fence;
> -
> - fence = xe_sync_in_fence_get(syncs, num_syncs, q, vm);
> - if (IS_ERR(fence)) {
> - err = PTR_ERR(fence);
> - goto err_exec;
> - }
> - for (i = 0; i < num_syncs; i++)
> - xe_sync_entry_signal(&syncs[i], NULL, fence);
> - xe_exec_queue_last_fence_set(q, vm, fence);
> - dma_fence_put(fence);
> - }
> -
> - goto err_exec;
> - }
> -
> if (xe_exec_queue_is_lr(q) && xe_exec_queue_ring_full(q)) {
> err = -EWOULDBLOCK; /* Aliased to -EAGAIN */
> skip_retry = true;
> --
> 2.44.0
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list