✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe: Perform dma_map when moving system buffer objects to TT (rev3)
Patchwork
patchwork at emeril.freedesktop.org
Thu May 2 18:38:52 UTC 2024
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/xe: Perform dma_map when moving system buffer objects to TT (rev3)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/133068/
State : success
== Summary ==
+ KERNEL=/kernel
+ git clone https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/maintainer-tools mt
Cloning into 'mt'...
warning: redirecting to https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/maintainer-tools.git/
+ git -C mt rev-list -n1 origin/master
0daf0be5bb95eb0a0e42275e00a0e42d8d8fd543
+ cd /kernel
+ git config --global --add safe.directory /kernel
+ git log -n1
commit a749e2b61b4418a1ebca82d0b6c6d421a3b932f9
Author: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu May 2 20:32:51 2024 +0200
drm/xe: Perform dma_map when moving system buffer objects to TT
Currently we dma_map on ttm_tt population and dma_unmap when
the pages are released in ttm_tt unpopulate.
Strictly, the dma_map is not needed until the bo is moved to the
XE_PL_TT placement, so perform the dma_mapping on such moves
instead, and remove the dma_mappig when moving to XE_PL_SYSTEM.
This is desired for the upcoming shrinker series where shrinking
of a ttm_tt might fail. That would lead to an odd construct where
we first dma_unmap, then shrink and if shrinking fails dma_map
again. If dma_mapping instead is performed on move like this,
shrinking does not need to care at all about dma mapping.
Finally, where a ttm_tt is destroyed while bound to a different
memory type than XE_PL_SYSTEM, we keep the dma_unmap in
unpopulate().
v2:
- Don't accidently unmap the dma-buf's sgtable.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com> #v1
+ /mt/dim checkpatch 83d6b363ebb5ba75c62b3d632a3eb2f73b05f9d6 drm-intel
a749e2b61b44 drm/xe: Perform dma_map when moving system buffer objects to TT
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list