[PATCH v7 1/2] drm/xe: add a new debugfs file - mmio
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Thu May 9 20:58:48 UTC 2024
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 11:11:04AM +0300, Koby Elbaz wrote:
> Now that the former mmio handlers are fully removed, this
> debugfs file will be used for mmio access (read/write)
> through the debugfs ioctl file operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Koby Elbaz <kelbaz at habana.ai>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> index c9b30dbdc14d..ce27516ffac0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> @@ -111,12 +111,22 @@ static int forcewake_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static long xe_debugfs_mmio_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct file_operations forcewake_all_fops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .open = forcewake_open,
> .release = forcewake_release,
> };
>
> +static const struct file_operations mmio_fops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .unlocked_ioctl = xe_debugfs_mmio_ioctl,
I was kind of afraid this was not done by other drivers in the debugfs,
but I found out other cases, so I'm fine with it.
But likely this patch should be merged with the second one?
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
> +};
> +
> void xe_debugfs_register(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> struct ttm_device *bdev = &xe->ttm;
> @@ -155,6 +165,8 @@ void xe_debugfs_register(struct xe_device *xe)
> for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> xe_gt_debugfs_register(gt);
>
> + debugfs_create_file("mmio", 0644, root, xe, &mmio_fops);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION
> fault_create_debugfs_attr("fail_gt_reset", root, >_reset_failure);
> #endif
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list