[PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/display: remove unused xe->enabled_irq_mask

[Jani Nikula]

On Mon, 13 May 2024, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 03:10:29PM GMT, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>On Fri, 10 May 2024, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com> wrote:
>>> The xe->enabled_irq_mask member has never been used for anything.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>>
>>Lucas, ack for merging these two via drm-intel-next? Even though these
>>touch struct xe_device, I presume any further cleanups touching the
>>surrounding context would have a bigger footprint in drm-intel-next.
>
>
>
> Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>
> for both patches

Thanks for the review and acks, pushed to drm-intel-next.

BR,
Jani.


>
> thanks,
> Lucas De Marchi
>
>>
>>BR,
>>Jani.
>>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 1 -
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h    | 2 --
>>>  2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
>>> index 0de0566e5b39..fbe2c2eddea9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
>>> @@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe)
>>>  	xe->display.hotplug.dp_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("xe-dp", 0);
>>>
>>>  	drmm_mutex_init(&xe->drm, &xe->sb_lock);
>>> -	xe->enabled_irq_mask = ~0;
>>>
>>>  	return drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, display_destroy, NULL);
>>>  }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>>> index 906b98fb973b..b78223e3baab 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>>> @@ -517,8 +517,6 @@ struct xe_device {
>>>  	/* only to allow build, not used functionally */
>>>  	u32 irq_mask;
>>>
>>> -	u32 enabled_irq_mask;
>>> -
>>>  	struct intel_uncore {
>>>  		spinlock_t lock;
>>>  	} uncore;
>>
>>-- 
>>Jani Nikula, Intel

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel