[PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/lnl: Apply Wa_22019338487

Belgaumkar, Vinay vinay.belgaumkar at intel.com
Tue May 14 17:24:40 UTC 2024


On 5/14/2024 7:36 AM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 03:48:56PM GMT, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:10:43AM -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/22/2024 11:09 AM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 01:13:43PM GMT, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>>> > > This WA requires us to limit media GT frequency requests to a 
>>> certain
>>> > > cap value during driver load as well as after driver unload. 
>>> Freq limits
>>> > > are restored after driver load completes, so perf will not be
>>> > > affected during normal operations.
>>> > >
>>> > > Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar at intel.com>
>>> > > ---
>>> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c |  6 +++++
>>> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c    |  8 +++++++
>>> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c | 40 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h |  3 +++
>>> > > 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>> > >
>>> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>> > > index d85a2ba0a057..e29c152a6c4e 100644
>>> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>> > > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>>> > > #include "xe_gsc_proxy.h"
>>> > > #include "xe_gt.h"
>>> > > #include "xe_gt_mcr.h"
>>> > > +#include "xe_guc_pc.h"
>>> > > #include "xe_hwmon.h"
>>> > > #include "xe_irq.h"
>>> > > #include "xe_memirq.h"
>>> > > @@ -336,6 +337,7 @@ static void xe_driver_flr(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> > > {
>>> > >     const unsigned int flr_timeout = 3 * MICRO; /* specs 
>>> recommend a
>>> > > 3s wait */
>>> > >     struct xe_gt *gt = xe_root_mmio_gt(xe);
>>> > > +    struct xe_guc_pc *pc = &gt->uc.guc.pc;
>>> > >     int ret;
>>> > >
>>> > >     if (xe_mmio_read32(gt, GU_CNTL_PROTECTED) & 
>>> DRIVERINT_FLR_DIS) {
>>> > > @@ -343,6 +345,10 @@ static void xe_driver_flr(struct xe_device 
>>> *xe)
>>> > >         return;
>>> > >     }
>>> > >
>>> > > +    /* Set requested freq to mert_freq_cap before FLR */
>>> > > +    if (xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(pc))
>>> > > +        pc_set_cur_freq(pc, min(xe_guc_pc_mert_freq_cap(pc),
>>> > > pc->rpe_freq));
>>> > > +
>>> > >     drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "Triggering Driver-FLR\n");
>>> > >
>>> > >     /*
>>> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
>>> > > index 60202b903687..556e73fca813 100644
>>> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
>>> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
>>> > > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>> > > #include "xe_gt.h"
>>> > > #include "xe_gt_mcr.h"
>>> > > #include "xe_gt_printk.h"
>>> > > +#include "xe_guc_pc.h"
>>> > > #include "xe_huc.h"
>>> > > #include "xe_map.h"
>>> > > #include "xe_mmio.h"
>>> > > @@ -339,6 +340,7 @@ static void gsc_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>> > >     struct xe_gsc *gsc = container_of(work, typeof(*gsc), work);
>>> > >     struct xe_gt *gt = gsc_to_gt(gsc);
>>> > >     struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
>>> > > +    struct xe_guc_pc *pc = &gt->uc.guc.pc;
>>> > >     u32 actions;
>>> > >     int ret;
>>> > >
>>> > > @@ -367,6 +369,12 @@ static void gsc_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>> > >     if (actions & GSC_ACTION_SW_PROXY)
>>> > >         xe_gsc_proxy_request_handler(gsc);
>>> > >
>>> > > +    /* Revert the min/max freq limits as we're done with 
>>> GSC/driver
>>> > > load */
>>> > > +    if (xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(pc)) {
>>> > > +        xe_guc_pc_set_max_freq(pc, pc->rp0_freq);
>>> > > +        xe_guc_pc_set_min_freq(pc, pc->rpe_freq);
>>> > > +    }
>>> > > +
>>> > > out:
>>> > >     xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
>>> > >     xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>>> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>>> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>>> > > index 521ae24f2314..7f82b6c2ad3c 100644
>>> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>>> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
>>> > > @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
>>> > > #define GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER    50
>>> > > #define GT_FREQUENCY_SCALER    3
>>> > >
>>> > > +#define LNL_MERT_FREQ_CAP    800
>>> > > +
>>> > > /**
>>> > >  * DOC: GuC Power Conservation (PC)
>>> > >  *
>>> > > @@ -237,7 +239,7 @@ static void pc_set_manual_rp_ctrl(struct
>>> > > xe_guc_pc *pc, bool enable)
>>> > >     xe_mmio_write32(gt, RP_CONTROL, state);
>>> > > }
>>> > >
>>> > > -static void pc_set_cur_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u32 freq)
>>> > > +void pc_set_cur_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u32 freq)
>>> > > {
>>> > >     struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
>>> > >     u32 rpnswreq;
>>> > > @@ -673,6 +675,25 @@ static void pc_init_fused_rp_values(struct
>>> > > xe_guc_pc *pc)
>>> > >         tgl_init_fused_rp_values(pc);
>>> > > }
>>> > >
>>> > > +bool xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>>> > > +{
>>> > > +    struct xe_gt *gt = pc_to_gt(pc);
>>> > > +    struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
>>> > > +
>>> > > +    if (MEDIA_VERx100(xe) == 2000 && xe_gt_is_media_type(gt))
>>> >
>>> > that's what xe_wa_oob.rules is for. Why are you adding it as a 
>>> separate
>>> > function that won't allow debugfs/.../workarounds to match reality?
>>>
>>> The workarounds are not initialized at this point, this is early in the
>>> driver load process.
>>
>> So we likely need to change that. or we will start to create a mess 
>> in terms
>> of handling the w/as.
>
>
> These patches are now merged:
>
>         d1855d284e9f drm/xe: Move sw-only pcode initialization
>         45b9066ec351 drm/xe: Move xe_force_wake_init_gt() inside gt 
> initialization
>         65c4de2a9148 drm/xe: Move xe_gt_init_early() where it belongs
>         402c014cbcc7 drm/xe: Drop useless forcewake get/put
>         61549a2ee594 drm/xe: Drop __engine_mask
>
> it's still not pretty, but now at least this part of the initialization
> order is not totally broken. With that we can check for the platform
> needing this WA in the right way.
>
>>
>> But another comment on this w/a is that it is incomplete. It is just 
>> part
>> of the w/a here. We need to count the GGTT page table updates and with
>> a threshold update another mmio reg, or something like that.
>> also drop the freq at module unload, and other stuff, no?!
>
> did we resolve this?

Yes, will send out a patch now that your series is merged.

Thanks,

Vinay.

>
> Lucas De Marchi
>
>>
>>>
>>> Vinay.
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Lucas De Marchi
>>> >
>>> > > +        return true;
>>> > > +
>>> > > +    return false;
>>> > > +}
>>> > > +
>>> > > +u32 xe_guc_pc_mert_freq_cap(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>>> > > +{
>>> > > +    if (MEDIA_VERx100(pc_to_xe(pc)) == 2000)
>>> > > +        return LNL_MERT_FREQ_CAP;
>>> > > +    else
>>> > > +        return 0;
>>> > > +}
>>> > > +
>>> > > /**
>>> > >  * xe_guc_pc_init_early - Initialize RPx values and request a 
>>> higher GT
>>> > >  * frequency to allow faster GuC load times
>>> > > @@ -684,7 +705,11 @@ void xe_guc_pc_init_early(struct xe_guc_pc 
>>> *pc)
>>> > >
>>> > >     xe_force_wake_assert_held(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
>>> > >     pc_init_fused_rp_values(pc);
>>> > > -    pc_set_cur_freq(pc, pc->rp0_freq);
>>> > > +
>>> > > +    if (xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(pc))
>>> > > +        pc_set_cur_freq(pc, min(xe_guc_pc_mert_freq_cap(pc),
>>> > > pc->rp0_freq));
>>> > > +    else
>>> > > +        pc_set_cur_freq(pc, pc->rp0_freq);
>>> > > }
>>> > >
>>> > > static int pc_adjust_freq_bounds(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
>>> > > @@ -715,6 +740,17 @@ static int pc_adjust_freq_bounds(struct
>>> > > xe_guc_pc *pc)
>>> > >     if (pc_get_min_freq(pc) > pc->rp0_freq)
>>> > >         ret = pc_set_min_freq(pc, pc->rp0_freq);
>>> > >
>>> > > +    if ((!ret) && xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(pc)) {
>>> > > +        /*
>>> > > +         * Setting min to RPn disables use of efficient freq
>>> > > +         * which could otherwise interfere with this WA for 
>>> media GT.
>>> > > +         * We will also bind max to MERT_FREQ_CAP until driver 
>>> loads.
>>> > > +         */
>>> > > +        ret = pc_set_min_freq(pc, pc->rpn_freq);
>>> > > +        if (!ret)
>>> > > +            ret = pc_set_max_freq(pc, min(pc->rp0_freq,
>>> > > xe_guc_pc_mert_freq_cap(pc)));
>>> > > +    }
>>> > > +
>>> > > out:
>>> > >     return ret;
>>> > > }
>>> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
>>> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
>>> > > index d3680d89490e..25fe693c7ee3 100644
>>> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
>>> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.h
>>> > > @@ -27,4 +27,7 @@ enum xe_gt_idle_state xe_guc_pc_c_status(struct
>>> > > xe_guc_pc *pc);
>>> > > u64 xe_guc_pc_rc6_residency(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>>> > > u64 xe_guc_pc_mc6_residency(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>>> > > void xe_guc_pc_init_early(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>>> > > +void pc_set_cur_freq(struct xe_guc_pc *pc, u32 freq);
>>> > > +bool xe_guc_pc_needs_wa_22019338487(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>>> > > +u32 xe_guc_pc_mert_freq_cap(struct xe_guc_pc *pc);
>>> > > #endif /* _XE_GUC_PC_H_ */
>>> > > --
>>> > > 2.38.1
>>> > >


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list