[PATCH v2] drm/xe/guc: Fix missing init value and add register order check
Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
alan.previn.teres.alexis at intel.com
Tue Nov 5 19:09:49 UTC 2024
A couple of nits, else LGTM, so:
Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis at intel.com>
On Mon, 2024-11-04 at 10:24 -0800, Zhanjun Dong wrote:
> Fix missing initial value for last_value.
> For GuC capture register definition, it is required to define 64bit
> register in a pair of 2 consecutive 32bit register entries, low first,
> then hi. Add code to check this order.
>
> Fixes: ecb633646391 ("drm/xe/guc: Plumb GuC-capture into dev coredump")
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong at intel.com>
> Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis at intel.com>
>
> Changes from prior revs:
> v2:- Correct the fix tag pointed commit
> Add examples in comments for warning
> Add 1 missing hi condition check
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> index cc72446a5de1..8e534471b566 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ struct __guc_capture_parsed_output {
> * A 64 bit register define requires 2 consecutive entries,
> * with low dword first and hi dword the second.
> * 2. Register name: null for incompleted define
> + * 3. Incorrect order will trigger XE_WARN.
> */
> #define COMMON_XELP_BASE_GLOBAL \
> { FORCEWAKE_GT, REG_32BIT, 0, 0, "FORCEWAKE_GT"}
> @@ -1675,10 +1676,10 @@ snapshot_print_by_list_order(struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_
> struct xe_devcoredump *devcoredump = &xe->devcoredump;
> struct xe_devcoredump_snapshot *devcore_snapshot = &devcoredump->snapshot;
> struct gcap_reg_list_info *reginfo = NULL;
> - u32 last_value, i;
> - bool is_ext;
> + u32 i, last_value = 0;
> + bool is_ext, low32_ready = false;
>
> - if (!list || list->num_regs == 0)
> + if (!list || !list->list || list->num_regs == 0)
> return;
> XE_WARN_ON(!devcore_snapshot->matched_node);
>
> @@ -1701,29 +1702,76 @@ snapshot_print_by_list_order(struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_
> continue;
>
> value = reg->value;
> - if (reg_desc->data_type == REG_64BIT_LOW_DW) {
> + switch (reg_desc->data_type) {
> + case REG_64BIT_LOW_DW:
> last_value = value;
> +
> + /*
> + * A 64 bit register define requires 2 consecutive
> + * entries in register list, with low dword first
> + * and hi dword the second, like:
> + * { XXX_REG_LO(0), REG_64BIT_LOW_DW, 0, 0, NULL},
> + * { XXX_REG_HI(0), REG_64BIT_HI_DW, 0, 0, "XXX_REG"},
> + *
> + * Incorrect order will trigger XE_WARN.
> + *
> + * Possible double low here, for example:
> + * { XXX_REG_LO(0), REG_64BIT_LOW_DW, 0, 0, NULL},
> + * { XXX_REG_LO(0), REG_64BIT_LOW_DW, 0, 0, NULL},
> + */
> + XE_WARN_ON(low32_ready);
> + low32_ready = true;
> /* Low 32 bit dword saved, continue for high 32 bit */
> - continue;
> - } else if (reg_desc->data_type == REG_64BIT_HI_DW) {
> + break;
> +
> + case REG_64BIT_HI_DW: {
alan: nit: now that you have moved to a switch statement, is this { really required?
> u64 value_qw = ((u64)value << 32) | last_value;
>
> + /* Incorrect 64bit register order. Possible missing low.
> + * for example:
> + * { XXX_REG(0), REG_32BIT, 0, 0, NULL},
> + * { XXX_REG_HI(0), REG_64BIT_HI_DW, 0, 0, NULL},
> + */
> + XE_WARN_ON(!low32_ready);
> + low32_ready = false;
> +
> drm_printf(p, "\t%s: 0x%016llx\n", reg_desc->regname, value_qw);
> - continue;
> - }
> + }
alan: nit: ditto
> + break;
> +
> + case REG_32BIT:
> + if (low32_ready) {
> + /* Incorrect 64bit register order. Possible missing high.
> + * for example:
> + * { XXX_REG_LO(0), REG_64BIT_LOW_DW, 0, 0, NULL},
> + * { XXX_REG(0), REG_32BIT, 0, 0, "XXX_REG"},
> + */
> + XE_WARN_ON(!low32_ready);
> + low32_ready = false;
> + break;
> + }
>
> - if (is_ext) {
> - int dss, group, instance;
> + if (is_ext) {
> + int dss, group, instance;
>
> - group = FIELD_GET(GUC_REGSET_STEERING_GROUP, reg_desc->flags);
> - instance = FIELD_GET(GUC_REGSET_STEERING_INSTANCE, reg_desc->flags);
> - dss = xe_gt_mcr_steering_info_to_dss_id(gt, group, instance);
> + group = FIELD_GET(GUC_REGSET_STEERING_GROUP, reg_desc->flags);
> + instance = FIELD_GET(GUC_REGSET_STEERING_INSTANCE, reg_desc->flags);
> + dss = xe_gt_mcr_steering_info_to_dss_id(gt, group, instance);
>
> - drm_printf(p, "\t%s[%u]: 0x%08x\n", reg_desc->regname, dss, value);
> - } else {
> - drm_printf(p, "\t%s: 0x%08x\n", reg_desc->regname, value);
> + drm_printf(p, "\t%s[%u]: 0x%08x\n", reg_desc->regname, dss, value);
> + } else {
> + drm_printf(p, "\t%s: 0x%08x\n", reg_desc->regname, value);
> + }
> + break;
> }
> }
> +
> + /* Incorrect 64bit register order. Possible missing high.
> + * for example:
> + * { XXX_REG_LO(0), REG_64BIT_LOW_DW, 0, 0, NULL},
> + * } // <- Register list end
> + */
> + XE_WARN_ON(low32_ready);
> }
>
> /**
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list