[PATCH v4 3/3] drm/xe: Cache hwe used for timestamp
Cavitt, Jonathan
jonathan.cavitt at intel.com
Fri Nov 8 15:26:35 UTC 2024
-----Original Message-----
From: De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2024 9:33 PM
To: intel-xe at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Cavitt, Jonathan <jonathan.cavitt at intel.com>; Nerlige Ramappa, Umesh <umesh.nerlige.ramappa at intel.com>; Brost, Matthew <matthew.brost at intel.com>; De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/xe: Cache hwe used for timestamp
>
> Cache the hwe used to read the timestamp so it doesn't need to be done
> every time it's read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
I have some notes, but nothing worth blocking on.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 5 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.c | 10 ++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 0e2dd691bdae9..9668a60e3aeae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -759,6 +759,8 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> xe_gt_sanitize_freq(gt);
>
> + xe_drm_client_init(xe);
> +
> return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_device_sanitize, xe);
>
> err_fini_display:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> index fffbb7d1c40b4..f13b738ce77a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>
> struct xe_ggtt;
> struct xe_pat_ops;
> +struct xe_hw_engine;
>
> #define XE_BO_INVALID_OFFSET LONG_MAX
>
> @@ -509,6 +510,10 @@ struct xe_device {
> int mode;
> } wedged;
>
> + struct {
> + struct xe_hw_engine *hwe;
> + } drm_client;
> +
> #ifdef TEST_VM_OPS_ERROR
> /**
> * @vm_inject_error_position: inject errors at different places in VM
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.c
> index 298a587da7f17..125ee18ab9f1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.c
> @@ -274,6 +274,9 @@ static struct xe_hw_engine *any_engine(struct xe_device *xe)
> struct xe_gt *gt;
> unsigned long gt_id;
>
> + if (xe->drm_client.hwe)
> + return xe->drm_client.hwe;
> +
> for_each_gt(gt, xe, gt_id) {
> struct xe_hw_engine *hwe = xe_gt_any_hw_engine(gt);
>
> @@ -394,4 +397,11 @@ void xe_drm_client_fdinfo(struct drm_printer *p, struct drm_file *file)
> show_meminfo(p, file);
> show_run_ticks(p, file);
> }
> +
> +void xe_drm_client_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + xe->drm_client.hwe = NULL;
> + xe->drm_client.hwe = any_engine(xe);
Two thoughts:
1.
I wonder if it would make sense for us to set xe->drm_client.hwe in any_engine, instead
of as a separate assignment? So, here we would call:
"""
void xe_drm_client_init(struct xe_device *xe)
{
xe->drm_client.hwe = NULL;
any_engine(xe);
}
"""
Then, in any_engine:
"""
static struct xe_hw_engine *any_engine(struct xe_device *xe)
{
struct xe_gt *gt;
unsigned long gt_id;
if (xe->drm_client.hwe)
return xe->drm_client.hwe;
for_each_gt(gt, xe, gt_id) {
struct xe_hw_engine *hwe = xe_gt_any_hw_engine(gt);
if (hwe) {
xe->drm_client.hwe = hwe;
return hwe;
}
}
return NULL;
}
"""
I can see why we might want to avoid doing something like this, but it's just a thought.
2.
I understand why drm_client.hwe needs to be assigned twice here (to avoid unassigned
data comparison in any_engine call), but it still looks a bit strange at a glance. It might
almost make sense to restructure the xe->drm_client structure to have a separate "found"
Boolean that can be set here:
"""
struct {
bool found;
struct xe_hw_engine *hwe;
} drm_client;
"""
Then, in any_engine:
"""
unsigned long gt_id;
if (xe->drm_client.found)
return xe->drm_client.hwe;
...
"""
And finally, in xe_drm_client_init:
"""
void xe_drm_client_init(struct xe_device *xe)
{
xe->drm_client.found = false;
...
"""
-Jonathan Cavitt
> +}
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.h
> index a9649aa360110..5609fbd682650 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> struct drm_file;
> struct drm_printer;
> struct xe_bo;
> +struct xe_device;
>
> struct xe_drm_client {
> struct kref kref;
> @@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ static inline void xe_drm_client_put(struct xe_drm_client *client)
> kref_put(&client->kref, __xe_drm_client_free);
> }
>
> +void xe_drm_client_init(struct xe_device *xe);
> struct xe_drm_client *xe_drm_client_alloc(void);
> static inline struct xe_drm_client *
> xe_drm_client_get(struct xe_drm_client *client);
> --
> 2.47.0
>
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list