[PATCH 1/2] platform/x86/intel/pmt: allow user offset for PMT callbacks
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Tue Nov 12 15:27:53 UTC 2024
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 02:38:06PM +0000, Ruhl, Michael J wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2024 3:34 AM
> > To: Ruhl, Michael J <michael.j.ruhl at intel.com>
> > Cc: intel-xe at lists.freedesktop.org; platform-driver-x86 at vger.kernel.org;
> > david.e.box at linux.intel.com; ilpo.jarvinen at linux.intel.com;
> > hdegoede at redhat.com; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>; De Marchi,
> > Lucas <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86/intel/pmt: allow user offset for PMT
> > callbacks
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 03:19:53PM -0500, Michael J. Ruhl wrote:
> > > Usage of the telem sysfs file allows for partial reads at an offset.
> > >
> > > The current callback method returns the buffer starting from offset 0
> > > only.
> > >
> > > Include the requested offset in the callback.
> > > Update the necsessary address calculations with the offset.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > - memcpy_fromio(buf, addr, count);
> > > + memcpy_fromio(buf, addr + off, count);
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> > This will give an unaligned IO access in some cases. Is it a problem?
>
> That is a good question.
>
> I moved this value from the caller to this location.
>
> So essentially it is "unchanged" from the current usage. Does that answer
> the question?
Probably. Please, mention this in the commit message.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list