[PATCH v2 00/21] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

Thomas Gleixner tglx at linutronix.de
Fri Nov 15 23:20:50 UTC 2024


On Fri, Nov 15 2024 at 14:15, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> On 11/15/2024 1:41 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> 
>> How do you expect this series to land since it overlaps a large number of
>> maintainer trees? Do you have a maintainer who has volunteered to take the
>> series and the maintainers should just ack? Or do you want the maintainers to
>> take the individual patches that are applicable to them?
>> 
>> /jeff
>
> I am hoping for tglx to take it through his tree since the patch
> introducing secs_to_jiffies() is in his tree, so sequencing of
> dependencies would not be an issue.

Right, but it's two days before the merge window opens, so no.

> But if tglx won't, we could push it out another cycle and individual
> maintainers can take the patches that are applicable to their tree for
> the series.

That's the easiest way forward as it does not create conflicts and all
maintainers will have the base patch in their trees after rc1.

Thanks,

        tglx


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list