[PATCH v2 13/29] drm/xe: Add unbind to SVM garbage collector

Matthew Brost matthew.brost at intel.com
Tue Nov 19 23:44:29 UTC 2024


On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 04:31:05PM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-10-15 at 20:25 -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > Add unbind to SVM garbage collector. To facilitate add unbind support
> > function to VM layer which unbinds a SVM range. Also teach PY layer
> > to
> > understand unbinds of SVM ranges.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c       | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > --
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c      |  9 +++-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c       | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h       |  2 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 12 ++++-
> >  5 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> > index 024e4eb83408..687abd1a5e74 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> > @@ -925,10 +925,16 @@ static void xe_pt_cancel_bind(struct xe_vma
> > *vma,
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > +#define INVALID_VMA	(struct xe_vma*)(0xdeaddeadull)
> 
> Please prefix with XE_ to avoid future name clashes.
> 

Good idea.

> > +
> >  static void xe_pt_commit_locks_assert(struct xe_vma *vma)
> >  {
> > -	struct xe_vm *vm = xe_vma_vm(vma);
> > +	struct xe_vm *vm;
> >  
> > +	if (vma == INVALID_VMA)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	vm = xe_vma_vm(vma);
> >  	lockdep_assert_held(&vm->lock);
> >  
> >  	if (!xe_vma_has_no_bo(vma))
> > @@ -954,7 +960,8 @@ static void xe_pt_commit(struct xe_vma *vma,
> >  		for (j = 0; j < entries[i].qwords; j++) {
> >  			struct xe_pt *oldpte =
> > entries[i].pt_entries[j].pt;
> >  
> > -			xe_pt_destroy(oldpte, xe_vma_vm(vma)->flags,
> > deferred);
> > +			xe_pt_destroy(oldpte, (vma == INVALID_VMA) ?
> > 0 :
> > +				      xe_vma_vm(vma)->flags,
> > deferred);
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  }
> > @@ -1387,6 +1394,9 @@ static int xe_pt_svm_pre_commit(struct
> > xe_migrate_pt_update *pt_update)
> >  	list_for_each_entry(op, &vops->list, link) {
> >  		struct xe_svm_range *range = op->map_range.range;
> >  
> > +		if (op->subop == XE_VMA_SUBOP_UNMAP_RANGE)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> >  		xe_assert(vm->xe, xe_vma_is_system_allocator(op-
> > >map_range.vma));
> >  		xe_assert(vm->xe, op->subop ==
> > XE_VMA_SUBOP_MAP_RANGE);
> >  
> > @@ -1585,7 +1595,9 @@ static const struct xe_pt_walk_ops
> > xe_pt_stage_unbind_ops = {
> >   * xe_pt_stage_unbind() - Build page-table update structures for an
> > unbind
> >   * operation
> >   * @tile: The tile we're unbinding for.
> > + * @vm: The vm
> >   * @vma: The vma we're unbinding.
> > + * @range: The range we're unbinding.
> >   * @entries: Caller-provided storage for the update structures.
> >   *
> >   * Builds page-table update structures for an unbind operation. The
> > function
> > @@ -1595,9 +1607,14 @@ static const struct xe_pt_walk_ops
> > xe_pt_stage_unbind_ops = {
> >   *
> >   * Return: The number of entries used.
> >   */
> > -static unsigned int xe_pt_stage_unbind(struct xe_tile *tile, struct
> > xe_vma *vma,
> > +static unsigned int xe_pt_stage_unbind(struct xe_tile *tile,
> > +				       struct xe_vm *vm,
> > +				       struct xe_vma *vma,
> > +				       struct xe_svm_range *range,
> >  				       struct xe_vm_pgtable_update
> > *entries)
> >  {
> > +	u64 start = range ? range->base.va.start :
> > xe_vma_start(vma);
> > +	u64 end = range ? range->base.va.end : xe_vma_end(vma);
> >  	struct xe_pt_stage_unbind_walk xe_walk = {
> >  		.base = {
> >  			.ops = &xe_pt_stage_unbind_ops,
> > @@ -1605,14 +1622,14 @@ static unsigned int xe_pt_stage_unbind(struct
> > xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma,
> >  			.max_level = XE_PT_HIGHEST_LEVEL,
> >  		},
> >  		.tile = tile,
> > -		.modified_start = xe_vma_start(vma),
> > -		.modified_end = xe_vma_end(vma),
> > +		.modified_start = start,
> > +		.modified_end = end,
> >  		.wupd.entries = entries,
> >  	};
> > -	struct xe_pt *pt = xe_vma_vm(vma)->pt_root[tile->id];
> > +	struct xe_pt *pt = vm->pt_root[tile->id];
> >  
> > -	(void)xe_pt_walk_shared(&pt->base, pt->level,
> > xe_vma_start(vma),
> > -				xe_vma_end(vma), &xe_walk.base);
> > +	(void)xe_pt_walk_shared(&pt->base, pt->level, start, end,
> > +				&xe_walk.base);
> >  
> >  	return xe_walk.wupd.num_used_entries;
> >  }
> > @@ -1854,13 +1871,6 @@ static int unbind_op_prepare(struct xe_tile
> > *tile,
> >  	       "Preparing unbind, with range [%llx...%llx)\n",
> >  	       xe_vma_start(vma), xe_vma_end(vma) - 1);
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	 * Wait for invalidation to complete. Can corrupt internal
> > page table
> > -	 * state if an invalidation is running while preparing an
> > unbind.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (xe_vma_is_userptr(vma) &&
> > xe_vm_in_fault_mode(xe_vma_vm(vma)))
> > -		mmu_interval_read_begin(&to_userptr_vma(vma)-
> > >userptr.notifier);
> > -
> >  	pt_op->vma = vma;
> >  	pt_op->bind = false;
> >  	pt_op->rebind = false;
> > @@ -1869,7 +1879,8 @@ static int unbind_op_prepare(struct xe_tile
> > *tile,
> >  	if (err)
> >  		return err;
> >  
> > -	pt_op->num_entries = xe_pt_stage_unbind(tile, vma, pt_op-
> > >entries);
> > +	pt_op->num_entries = xe_pt_stage_unbind(tile,
> > xe_vma_vm(vma),
> > +						vma, NULL, pt_op-
> > >entries);
> >  
> >  	xe_vm_dbg_print_entries(tile_to_xe(tile), pt_op->entries,
> >  				pt_op->num_entries, false);
> > @@ -1884,6 +1895,42 @@ static int unbind_op_prepare(struct xe_tile
> > *tile,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int unbind_range_prepare(struct xe_vm *vm,
> > +				struct xe_tile *tile,
> > +				struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_ops
> > *pt_update_ops,
> > +				struct xe_svm_range *range)
> > +{
> > +	u32 current_op = pt_update_ops->current_op;
> > +	struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_op *pt_op = &pt_update_ops-
> > >ops[current_op];
> > +
> > +	if (!(range->tile_present & BIT(tile->id)))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	vm_dbg(&vm->xe->drm,
> > +	       "Preparing unbind, with range [%llx...%llx)\n",
> > +	       range->base.va.start, range->base.va.end - 1);
> > +
> > +	pt_op->vma = INVALID_VMA;
> > +	pt_op->bind = false;
> > +	pt_op->rebind = false;
> > +
> > +	pt_op->num_entries = xe_pt_stage_unbind(tile, vm, NULL,
> > range,
> > +						pt_op->entries);
> > +
> > +	xe_vm_dbg_print_entries(tile_to_xe(tile), pt_op->entries,
> > +				pt_op->num_entries, false);
> > +	xe_pt_update_ops_rfence_interval(pt_update_ops, range-
> > >base.va.start,
> > +					 range->base.va.end);
> > +	++pt_update_ops->current_op;
> > +	pt_update_ops->needs_svm_lock = true;
> > +	pt_update_ops->needs_invalidation = true;
> > +
> > +	xe_pt_commit_prepare_unbind(INVALID_VMA, pt_op->entries,
> > +				    pt_op->num_entries);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int op_prepare(struct xe_vm *vm,
> >  		      struct xe_tile *tile,
> >  		      struct xe_vm_pgtable_update_ops
> > *pt_update_ops,
> > @@ -1951,6 +1998,9 @@ static int op_prepare(struct xe_vm *vm,
> >  			err = bind_range_prepare(vm, tile,
> > pt_update_ops,
> >  						 op->map_range.vma,
> >  						 op-
> > >map_range.range);
> > +		} else if (op->subop == XE_VMA_SUBOP_UNMAP_RANGE) {
> > +			err = unbind_range_prepare(vm, tile,
> > pt_update_ops,
> > +						   op-
> > >unmap_range.range);
> >  		}
> >  		break;
> >  	default:
> > @@ -2139,6 +2189,8 @@ static void op_commit(struct xe_vm *vm,
> >  		if (op->subop == XE_VMA_SUBOP_MAP_RANGE) {
> >  			op->map_range.range->tile_present |=
> > BIT(tile->id);
> >  			op->map_range.range->tile_invalidated &=
> > ~BIT(tile->id);
> > +		} else if (op->subop == XE_VMA_SUBOP_UNMAP_RANGE) {
> > +			op->unmap_range.range->tile_present &=
> > ~BIT(tile->id);
> >  		}
> >  		break;
> >  	}
> 
> I think this further stresses the need to provide a pt code interface
> that is oblivious of vmas, userptr and ranges so that we can get rid of
> all special-casing, but for now code looks good as is IMO.
> 

I agree eventually it would be nice drop vmas / userptr / ranges from
the bind code. I believe I even opened a Jira for this task. The main
issue I see is tile_present, tile_invalidated needs to be moved to the
PT state which is a fairly large refactor. We also short circuit in
bunch of places based on this state which would turn into a page table
walk which also needs to be considered too.

As long as you ok with this for now, I agree let's scope / do in a
follow up.

> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> > index 9c2f44cba166..0762126f65e0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> > @@ -208,7 +208,14 @@ static void xe_svm_invalidate(struct drm_gpusvm
> > *gpusvm,
> >  static int __xe_svm_garbage_collector(struct xe_vm *vm,
> >  				      struct xe_svm_range *range)
> >  {
> > -	/* TODO: Do unbind */
> > +	struct dma_fence *fence;
> > +
> > +	xe_vm_lock(vm, false);
> > +	fence = xe_vm_range_unbind(vm, range);
> > +	xe_vm_unlock(vm);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(fence))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(fence);
> > +	dma_fence_put(fence);
> >  
> >  	drm_gpusvm_range_remove(&vm->svm.gpusvm, &range->base);
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > index 399cbbdbddd5..76a20e96084e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > @@ -972,6 +972,79 @@ struct dma_fence *xe_vm_range_rebind(struct
> > xe_vm *vm,
> >  	return fence;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void xe_vm_populate_range_unbind(struct xe_vma_op *op,
> > +					struct xe_svm_range *range)
> > +{
> > +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&op->link);
> > +	op->tile_mask = range->tile_present;
> > +	op->base.op = DRM_GPUVA_OP_USER;
> > +	op->subop = XE_VMA_SUBOP_UNMAP_RANGE;
> > +	op->unmap_range.range = range;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +xe_vm_ops_add_range_unbind(struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
> > +			   struct xe_svm_range *range)
> > +{
> > +	struct xe_vma_op *op;
> > +
> > +	op = kzalloc(sizeof(*op), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!op)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	xe_vm_populate_range_unbind(op, range);
> > +	list_add_tail(&op->link, &vops->list);
> > +	xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, range->tile_present);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct dma_fence *xe_vm_range_unbind(struct xe_vm *vm,
> > +				     struct xe_svm_range *range)
> 
> Kerneldoc.
> 

Yep.

Matt

> 
> > +{
> > +	struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
> > +	struct xe_vma_ops vops;
> > +	struct xe_vma_op *op, *next_op;
> > +	struct xe_tile *tile;
> > +	u8 id;
> > +	int err;
> > +
> > +	lockdep_assert_held(&vm->lock);
> > +	xe_vm_assert_held(vm);
> > +	xe_assert(vm->xe, xe_vm_in_fault_mode(vm));
> > +
> > +	if (!range->tile_present)
> > +		return dma_fence_get_stub();
> > +
> > +	xe_vma_ops_init(&vops, vm, NULL, NULL, 0);
> > +	for_each_tile(tile, vm->xe, id) {
> > +		vops.pt_update_ops[id].wait_vm_bookkeep = true;
> > +		vops.pt_update_ops[tile->id].q =
> > +			xe_tile_migrate_exec_queue(tile);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	err = xe_vm_ops_add_range_unbind(&vops, range);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		return ERR_PTR(err);
> > +
> > +	err = xe_vma_ops_alloc(&vops, false);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		fence = ERR_PTR(err);
> > +		goto free_ops;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	fence = ops_execute(vm, &vops);
> > +
> > +free_ops:
> > +	list_for_each_entry_safe(op, next_op, &vops.list, link) {
> > +		list_del(&op->link);
> > +		kfree(op);
> > +	}
> > +	xe_vma_ops_fini(&vops);
> > +
> > +	return fence;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void xe_vma_free(struct xe_vma *vma)
> >  {
> >  	if (xe_vma_is_userptr(vma))
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h
> > index 8bd921b33090..d577ca9e3d65 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h
> > @@ -222,6 +222,8 @@ struct dma_fence *xe_vm_range_rebind(struct xe_vm
> > *vm,
> >  				     struct xe_vma *vma,
> >  				     struct xe_svm_range *range,
> >  				     u8 tile_mask);
> > +struct dma_fence *xe_vm_range_unbind(struct xe_vm *vm,
> > +				     struct xe_svm_range *range);
> >  
> >  int xe_vm_invalidate_vma(struct xe_vma *vma);
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> > index 2eae3575c409..d38cf7558f62 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
> > @@ -348,6 +348,12 @@ struct xe_vma_op_map_range {
> >  	struct xe_svm_range *range;
> >  };
> >  
> > +/** struct xe_vma_op_unmap_range - VMA unmap range operation */
> > +struct xe_vma_op_unmap_range {
> > +	/** @range: SVM range to unmap */
> > +	struct xe_svm_range *range;
> > +};
> > +
> >  /** enum xe_vma_op_flags - flags for VMA operation */
> >  enum xe_vma_op_flags {
> >  	/** @XE_VMA_OP_COMMITTED: VMA operation committed */
> > @@ -362,6 +368,8 @@ enum xe_vma_op_flags {
> >  enum xe_vma_subop {
> >  	/** @XE_VMA_SUBOP_MAP_RANGE: Map range */
> >  	XE_VMA_SUBOP_MAP_RANGE,
> > +	/** @XE_VMA_SUBOP_UNMAP_RANGE: Unmap range */
> > +	XE_VMA_SUBOP_UNMAP_RANGE,
> >  };
> >  
> >  /** struct xe_vma_op - VMA operation */
> > @@ -384,8 +392,10 @@ struct xe_vma_op {
> >  		struct xe_vma_op_remap remap;
> >  		/** @prefetch: VMA prefetch operation specific data
> > */
> >  		struct xe_vma_op_prefetch prefetch;
> > -		/** @map: VMA map range operation specific data */
> > +		/** @map_range: VMA map range operation specific
> > data */
> >  		struct xe_vma_op_map_range map_range;
> > +		/** @unmap_range: VMA unmap range operation specific
> > data */
> > +		struct xe_vma_op_map_range unmap_range;
> >  	};
> >  };
> >  
> 
> Thanks,
> Thomas
> 


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list