[PATCH v2 4/4] drm/xe/ct: drop irq usage of xa_erase()

[Matthew Auld]

Unclear why disabling interrupts is needed here. Nothing seems to be
touching fence_lookup and its corresponding lock from an irq so there
should be no risk of deadlock.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
index d3de2e6d690f..3fd1d4e97528 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ static int guc_ct_send_recv(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
 			goto retry_same_fence;
 
 		if (!g2h_fence_needs_alloc(&g2h_fence))
-			xa_erase_irq(&ct->fence_lookup, g2h_fence.seqno);
+			xa_erase(&ct->fence_lookup, g2h_fence.seqno);
 
 		return ret;
 	}
@@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ static int guc_ct_send_recv(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
 	if (!ret) {
 		xe_gt_err(gt, "Timed out wait for G2H, fence %u, action %04x, done %s",
 			  g2h_fence.seqno, action[0], str_yes_no(g2h_fence.done));
-		xa_erase_irq(&ct->fence_lookup, g2h_fence.seqno);
+		xa_erase(&ct->fence_lookup, g2h_fence.seqno);
 		mutex_unlock(&ct->lock);
 		return -ETIME;
 	}
-- 
2.46.2