[PATCH 03/13] drm/i915/display: Add macro HAS_ULTRAJOINER()
Nautiyal, Ankit K
ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com
Tue Oct 1 14:13:54 UTC 2024
On 10/1/2024 5:32 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2024, Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com> wrote:
>> Add macro to check if platform supports Ultrajoiner.
>>
>> v2:
>> -Use check for DISPLAY_VER >= 20, and add bmg as a special case. (Ville)
>> -Add check for HAS_DSC. (Ville)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>> index 6a5bee59e6aa..220cca6333ee 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
>> @@ -154,6 +154,9 @@ enum intel_display_subplatform {
>> #define HAS_TRANSCODER(i915, trans) ((DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cpu_transcoder_mask & \
>> BIT(trans)) != 0)
>> #define HAS_UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER(i915) (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 13)
>> +#define HAS_ULTRAJOINER(i915) ((DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20 || \
>> + (IS_DGFX(i915) && DISPLAY_VER(i915) == 14)) && \
> Do we need to depend on IS_DGFX() here?
For Display 14, yes as its supported on Battlemage only. I think Stan
had used IS_DGFX() in original series, I went ahead with it.
We can replace with IS_BATTLEMAGE() if required.
Regards,
Ankit
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>> + HAS_DSC(i915))
>> #define HAS_VRR(i915) (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 11)
>> #define HAS_AS_SDP(i915) (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 13)
>> #define HAS_CMRR(i915) (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20)
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list