[PATCH] drm/i915/xe2lpd: Update C20 HDMI TMDS algorithm to include tx_misc

Pottumuttu, Sai Teja sai.teja.pottumuttu at intel.com
Fri Oct 18 14:16:43 UTC 2024


On 18-10-2024 02:23, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
> There has been an update to the Bspec in which we need to set
> tx_misc=0x5 field for C20 TX Context programming for HDMI TMDS for
> Xe2_LPD and newer. That field is mapped to the bits 7:0 of
> SRAM_GENERIC_<A/B>_TX_CNTX_CFG_1, which in turn translates to tx[1] of
> our state struct. Update the algorithm to reflect this change.
>
> Bspec: 74489
Nit: Would 74491 be a better Bspec here?
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c    | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>   .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy_regs.h   |  2 ++
>   2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> index f73d576fd99e..22184b2d5a11 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> @@ -2142,8 +2142,12 @@ static void intel_c10pll_dump_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>   			    i + 2, hw_state->pll[i + 2], i + 3, hw_state->pll[i + 3]);
>   }
>   
> -static int intel_c20_compute_hdmi_tmds_pll(u64 pixel_clock, struct intel_c20pll_state *pll_state)
> +static int intel_c20_compute_hdmi_tmds_pll(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> +					   u64 pixel_clock,
> +					   struct intel_c20pll_state *pll_state)
>   {
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
> +
>   	u64 datarate;
>   	u64 mpll_tx_clk_div;
>   	u64 vco_freq_shift;
> @@ -2154,6 +2158,7 @@ static int intel_c20_compute_hdmi_tmds_pll(u64 pixel_clock, struct intel_c20pll_
>   	u64 mpll_fracn_rem;
>   	u8  mpllb_ana_freq_vco;
>   	u8  mpll_div_multiplier;
> +	u16  tx_misc;
>   
>   	if (pixel_clock < 25175 || pixel_clock > 600000)
>   		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -2171,6 +2176,11 @@ static int intel_c20_compute_hdmi_tmds_pll(u64 pixel_clock, struct intel_c20pll_
>   	mpll_div_multiplier = min_t(u8, div64_u64((vco_freq * 16 + (datarate >> 1)),
>   						  datarate), 255);
>   
> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20)
> +		tx_misc = 0x5;
> +	else
> +		tx_misc = 0x0;
Looks like tx_misc changed from 0x1 to 0x5 and not from 0x0.

Thanks
Sai Teja
> +
>   	if (vco_freq <= DATARATE_3000000000)
>   		mpllb_ana_freq_vco = MPLLB_ANA_FREQ_VCO_3;
>   	else if (vco_freq <= DATARATE_3500000000)
> @@ -2182,7 +2192,7 @@ static int intel_c20_compute_hdmi_tmds_pll(u64 pixel_clock, struct intel_c20pll_
>   
>   	pll_state->clock	= pixel_clock;
>   	pll_state->tx[0]	= 0xbe88;
> -	pll_state->tx[1]	= 0x9800;
> +	pll_state->tx[1]	= 0x9800 | C20_PHY_TX_MISC(tx_misc);
>   	pll_state->tx[2]	= 0x0000;
>   	pll_state->cmn[0]	= 0x0500;
>   	pll_state->cmn[1]	= 0x0005;
> @@ -2266,7 +2276,8 @@ static int intel_c20pll_calc_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>   
>   	/* try computed C20 HDMI tables before using consolidated tables */
>   	if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI)) {
> -		if (intel_c20_compute_hdmi_tmds_pll(crtc_state->port_clock,
> +		if (intel_c20_compute_hdmi_tmds_pll(encoder,
> +						    crtc_state->port_clock,
>   						    &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.cx0pll.c20) == 0)
>   			return 0;
>   	}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy_regs.h
> index ab3ae110b68f..c1949aa1b909 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy_regs.h
> @@ -280,6 +280,8 @@
>   #define PHY_C20_B_TX_CNTX_CFG(i915, idx) \
>   		((_IS_XE2HPD_C20(i915) ? _XE2HPD_C20_B_TX_CNTX_CFG : _MTL_C20_B_TX_CNTX_CFG) - (idx))
>   #define   C20_PHY_TX_RATE		REG_GENMASK(2, 0)
> +#define   C20_PHY_TX_MISC_MASK		REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define   C20_PHY_TX_MISC(val)		REG_FIELD_PREP16(C20_PHY_TX_MISC_MASK, (val))
>   
>   #define PHY_C20_A_CMN_CNTX_CFG(i915, idx) \
>   		((_IS_XE2HPD_C20(i915) ? _XE2HPD_C20_A_CMN_CNTX_CFG : _MTL_C20_A_CMN_CNTX_CFG) - (idx))


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list