[PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/icl_dsi: Move helpers to configure dsi dual link to intel_dss
Nautiyal, Ankit K
ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com
Mon Sep 2 04:51:05 UTC 2024
On 8/30/2024 4:55 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 10:39:37AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
>> Move the function to configure dss_ctl for dual_link dsi to intel_dss
>> files. While at it, use struct intel_display wherever possible.
>>
>> v2: Avoid modifying the code while movement. (Jani)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c | 57 ++----------------------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.h | 3 ++
>> 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c
>> index 79e149d51cb2..ec880d1cbbee 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c
>> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
>> #include "intel_de.h"
>> #include "intel_dsi.h"
>> #include "intel_dsi_vbt.h"
>> -#include "intel_dss_regs.h"
>> +#include "intel_dss.h"
>> #include "intel_panel.h"
>> #include "intel_vdsc.h"
>> #include "skl_scaler.h"
>> @@ -274,55 +274,6 @@ static void dsi_program_swing_and_deemphasis(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -static void configure_dual_link_mode(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> - const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
>> - u8 dual_link, u8 pixel_overlap)
>> -{
>> - struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(encoder);
>> - i915_reg_t dss_ctl1_reg, dss_ctl2_reg;
>> - u32 dss_ctl1;
>> -
>> - /* FIXME: Move all DSS handling to intel_vdsc.c */
>> - if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 12) {
>> - struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(pipe_config->uapi.crtc);
>> -
>> - dss_ctl1_reg = ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1(crtc->pipe);
>> - dss_ctl2_reg = ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL2(crtc->pipe);
>> - } else {
>> - dss_ctl1_reg = DSS_CTL1;
>> - dss_ctl2_reg = DSS_CTL2;
>> - }
>> -
>> - dss_ctl1 = intel_de_read(display, dss_ctl1_reg);
>> - dss_ctl1 |= SPLITTER_ENABLE;
>> - dss_ctl1 &= ~OVERLAP_PIXELS_MASK;
>> - dss_ctl1 |= OVERLAP_PIXELS(pixel_overlap);
>> -
>> - if (dual_link == DSI_DUAL_LINK_FRONT_BACK) {
>> - const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
>> - &pipe_config->hw.adjusted_mode;
>> - u16 hactive = adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay;
>> - u16 dl_buffer_depth;
>> -
>> - dss_ctl1 &= ~DUAL_LINK_MODE_INTERLEAVE;
>> - dl_buffer_depth = hactive / 2 + pixel_overlap;
>> -
>> - if (dl_buffer_depth > MAX_DL_BUFFER_TARGET_DEPTH)
>> - drm_err(display->drm,
>> - "DL buffer depth exceed max value\n");
>> -
>> - dss_ctl1 &= ~LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK;
>> - dss_ctl1 |= LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(dl_buffer_depth);
>> - intel_de_rmw(display, dss_ctl2_reg, RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK,
>> - RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(dl_buffer_depth));
>> - } else {
>> - /* Interleave */
>> - dss_ctl1 |= DUAL_LINK_MODE_INTERLEAVE;
>> - }
>> -
>> - intel_de_write(display, dss_ctl1_reg, dss_ctl1);
>> -}
>> -
>> /* aka DSI 8X clock */
>> static int afe_clk(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>> @@ -791,9 +742,9 @@ gen11_dsi_configure_transcoder(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> }
>>
>> /* configure stream splitting */
>> - configure_dual_link_mode(encoder, pipe_config,
>> - intel_dsi->dual_link,
>> - intel_dsi->pixel_overlap);
>> + intel_dss_dsi_dual_link_mode_configure(encoder, pipe_config,
>> + intel_dsi->dual_link,
>> + intel_dsi->pixel_overlap);
>> }
>>
>> for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.c
>> index 3f7f416eb3fa..969e32143983 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.c
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>> #include "i915_reg_defs.h"
>> #include "intel_de.h"
>> #include "intel_display_types.h"
>> +#include "intel_dsi.h"
>> #include "intel_dss.h"
>> #include "intel_dss_regs.h"
>>
>> @@ -87,3 +88,52 @@ void intel_dss_mso_configure(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>> SPLITTER_ENABLE | SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_MASK |
>> OVERLAP_PIXELS_MASK, dss1);
>> }
>> +
>> +void intel_dss_dsi_dual_link_mode_configure(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> + const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
>> + u8 dual_link,
>> + u8 pixel_overlap)
>> +{
>> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(encoder);
>> + i915_reg_t dss_ctl1_reg, dss_ctl2_reg;
>> + u32 dss_ctl1;
>> +
>> + if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 12) {
>> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(pipe_config->uapi.crtc);
>> +
>> + dss_ctl1_reg = ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1(crtc->pipe);
>> + dss_ctl2_reg = ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL2(crtc->pipe);
>> + } else {
>> + dss_ctl1_reg = DSS_CTL1;
>> + dss_ctl2_reg = DSS_CTL2;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dss_ctl1 = intel_de_read(display, dss_ctl1_reg);
>> + dss_ctl1 |= SPLITTER_ENABLE;
>> + dss_ctl1 &= ~OVERLAP_PIXELS_MASK;
>> + dss_ctl1 |= OVERLAP_PIXELS(pixel_overlap);
>> +
>> + if (dual_link == DSI_DUAL_LINK_FRONT_BACK) {
>> + const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
>> + &pipe_config->hw.adjusted_mode;
>> + u16 hactive = adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay;
>> + u16 dl_buffer_depth;
>> +
>> + dss_ctl1 &= ~DUAL_LINK_MODE_INTERLEAVE;
>> + dl_buffer_depth = hactive / 2 + pixel_overlap;
>> +
>> + if (dl_buffer_depth > MAX_DL_BUFFER_TARGET_DEPTH)
>> + drm_err(display->drm,
>> + "DL buffer depth exceed max value\n");
>> +
>> + dss_ctl1 &= ~LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK;
>> + dss_ctl1 |= LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(dl_buffer_depth);
>> + intel_de_rmw(display, dss_ctl2_reg, RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK,
>> + RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(dl_buffer_depth));
> Leaking the DSI mess outside of the DSI code is not great. The DSI
> code should really just be taught to use the crtc_state properly.
I do agree. Perhaps have a separate structure for DSS in
intel_crtc_state with relevant bits, which would be computed in
compute_config and then we write it one time.
Can we have a separate patch series to fix this and mso part, and just
have DSS, joiner things separated from VDSC as a first step?
Regards,
Ankit
>
>> + } else {
>> + /* Interleave */
>> + dss_ctl1 |= DUAL_LINK_MODE_INTERLEAVE;
>> + }
>> +
>> + intel_de_write(display, dss_ctl1_reg, dss_ctl1);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.h
>> index d4629052979a..aa8c67c15855 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dss.h
>> @@ -16,5 +16,8 @@ u8 intel_dss_mso_pipe_mask(struct intel_display *display);
>> void intel_dss_mso_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
>> void intel_dss_mso_configure(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>> +void intel_dss_dsi_dual_link_mode_configure(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> + const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
>> + u8 dual_link, u8 pixel_overlap);
>>
>> #endif /* __INTEL_DSS_H__ */
>> --
>> 2.45.2
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list