[PATCH 4/4] drm/xe/bo: add some annotations in bo_put()
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Tue Sep 10 14:52:26 UTC 2024
Hi,
On 10/09/2024 14:59, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 02:11:49PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
>> If the put() triggers bo destroy then there is at least one potential
>> sleeping lock. Also annotate bos_lock and ggtt lock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
>> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray at intel.com>
>> Cc: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay at intel.com>
>> Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h | 6 +-----
>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
>> index 53948a965404..4176b302c38d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
>> @@ -2320,6 +2320,20 @@ void xe_bo_put_commit(struct llist_head *deferred)
>> drm_gem_object_free(&bo->ttm.base.refcount);
>> }
>>
>> +void xe_bo_put(struct xe_bo *bo)
>
> These are helpful but thinking we might need a version without asserts
> that can be used in code paths where we know that we have another ref to
> the BO. I can already think of a case in the SVM code where this would
> be needed. In that version maybe we assert the ref count > 1, granted
> that races but probably the best we can there.
Yeah, adding another put() variant or similar for that case should be
totally fine I think.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Asserts look good though.
>
> Matt
>
>> +{
>> + might_sleep();
>> + if (bo) {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>> + if (bo->client)
>> + might_lock(&bo->client->bos_lock);
>> +#endif
>> + if (bo->ggtt_node && bo->ggtt_node->ggtt)
>> + might_lock(&bo->ggtt_node->ggtt->lock);
>> + drm_gem_object_put(&bo->ttm.base);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * xe_bo_dumb_create - Create a dumb bo as backing for a fb
>> * @file_priv: ...
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
>> index dbfb3209615d..6e4be52306df 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.h
>> @@ -126,11 +126,7 @@ static inline struct xe_bo *xe_bo_get(struct xe_bo *bo)
>> return bo;
>> }
>>
>> -static inline void xe_bo_put(struct xe_bo *bo)
>> -{
>> - if (bo)
>> - drm_gem_object_put(&bo->ttm.base);
>> -}
>> +void xe_bo_put(struct xe_bo *bo);
>>
>> static inline void __xe_bo_unset_bulk_move(struct xe_bo *bo)
>> {
>> --
>> 2.46.0
>>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list