[PATCH v2 17/43] drm/xe/device: Convert register access to use xe_mmio
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Tue Sep 10 18:05:57 UTC 2024
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 05:08:06PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> Stop using GT pointers for register access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 449b85035d3a..cca17422bc2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -399,10 +399,10 @@ struct xe_device *xe_device_create(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> static void xe_driver_flr(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> const unsigned int flr_timeout = 3 * MICRO; /* specs recommend a 3s wait */
> - struct xe_gt *gt = xe_root_mmio_gt(xe);
> + struct xe_mmio *mmio = xe_root_tile_mmio(xe);
> int ret;
>
> - if (xe_mmio_read32(gt, GU_CNTL_PROTECTED) & DRIVERINT_FLR_DIS) {
> + if (xe_mmio_read32(mmio, GU_CNTL_PROTECTED) & DRIVERINT_FLR_DIS) {
> drm_info_once(&xe->drm, "BIOS Disabled Driver-FLR\n");
> return;
> }
> @@ -418,25 +418,25 @@ static void xe_driver_flr(struct xe_device *xe)
> * is still pending (unless the HW is totally dead), but better to be
> * safe in case something unexpected happens
> */
> - ret = xe_mmio_wait32(gt, GU_CNTL, DRIVERFLR, 0, flr_timeout, NULL, false);
> + ret = xe_mmio_wait32(mmio, GU_CNTL, DRIVERFLR, 0, flr_timeout, NULL, false);
> if (ret) {
> drm_err(&xe->drm, "Driver-FLR-prepare wait for ready failed! %d\n", ret);
> return;
> }
> - xe_mmio_write32(gt, GU_DEBUG, DRIVERFLR_STATUS);
> + xe_mmio_write32(mmio, GU_DEBUG, DRIVERFLR_STATUS);
>
> /* Trigger the actual Driver-FLR */
> - xe_mmio_rmw32(gt, GU_CNTL, 0, DRIVERFLR);
> + xe_mmio_rmw32(mmio, GU_CNTL, 0, DRIVERFLR);
>
> /* Wait for hardware teardown to complete */
> - ret = xe_mmio_wait32(gt, GU_CNTL, DRIVERFLR, 0, flr_timeout, NULL, false);
> + ret = xe_mmio_wait32(mmio, GU_CNTL, DRIVERFLR, 0, flr_timeout, NULL, false);
> if (ret) {
> drm_err(&xe->drm, "Driver-FLR-teardown wait completion failed! %d\n", ret);
> return;
> }
>
> /* Wait for hardware/firmware re-init to complete */
> - ret = xe_mmio_wait32(gt, GU_DEBUG, DRIVERFLR_STATUS, DRIVERFLR_STATUS,
> + ret = xe_mmio_wait32(mmio, GU_DEBUG, DRIVERFLR_STATUS, DRIVERFLR_STATUS,
> flr_timeout, NULL, false);
> if (ret) {
> drm_err(&xe->drm, "Driver-FLR-reinit wait completion failed! %d\n", ret);
> @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static void xe_driver_flr(struct xe_device *xe)
> }
>
> /* Clear sticky completion status */
> - xe_mmio_write32(gt, GU_DEBUG, DRIVERFLR_STATUS);
> + xe_mmio_write32(mmio, GU_DEBUG, DRIVERFLR_STATUS);
> }
>
> static void xe_driver_flr_fini(void *arg)
> @@ -487,16 +487,15 @@ static int xe_set_dma_info(struct xe_device *xe)
> return err;
> }
>
> -static bool verify_lmem_ready(struct xe_gt *gt)
> +static bool verify_lmem_ready(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> - u32 val = xe_mmio_read32(gt, GU_CNTL) & LMEM_INIT;
> + u32 val = xe_mmio_read32(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe), GU_CNTL) & LMEM_INIT;
>
> return !!val;
> }
>
> static int wait_for_lmem_ready(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> - struct xe_gt *gt = xe_root_mmio_gt(xe);
> unsigned long timeout, start;
>
> if (!IS_DGFX(xe))
> @@ -505,7 +504,7 @@ static int wait_for_lmem_ready(struct xe_device *xe)
> if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> return 0;
>
> - if (verify_lmem_ready(gt))
> + if (verify_lmem_ready(xe))
> return 0;
>
> drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "Waiting for lmem initialization\n");
> @@ -534,7 +533,7 @@ static int wait_for_lmem_ready(struct xe_device *xe)
>
> msleep(20);
>
> - } while (!verify_lmem_ready(gt));
> + } while (!verify_lmem_ready(xe));
>
> drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "lmem ready after %ums",
> jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - start));
> @@ -813,11 +812,9 @@ void xe_device_shutdown(struct xe_device *xe)
> */
> void xe_device_wmb(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> - struct xe_gt *gt = xe_root_mmio_gt(xe);
This lmem_ready change from gt to xe should deserve a separate change.
But up to you
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> -
> wmb();
> if (IS_DGFX(xe))
> - xe_mmio_write32(gt, VF_CAP_REG, 0);
> + xe_mmio_write32(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe), VF_CAP_REG, 0);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -858,7 +855,7 @@ void xe_device_td_flush(struct xe_device *xe)
> if (xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT))
> return;
>
> - xe_mmio_write32(gt, XE2_TDF_CTRL, TRANSIENT_FLUSH_REQUEST);
> + xe_mmio_write32(>->mmio, XE2_TDF_CTRL, TRANSIENT_FLUSH_REQUEST);
> /*
> * FIXME: We can likely do better here with our choice of
> * timeout. Currently we just assume the worst case, i.e. 150us,
> @@ -866,7 +863,7 @@ void xe_device_td_flush(struct xe_device *xe)
> * scenario on current platforms if all cache entries are
> * transient and need to be flushed..
> */
> - if (xe_mmio_wait32(gt, XE2_TDF_CTRL, TRANSIENT_FLUSH_REQUEST, 0,
> + if (xe_mmio_wait32(>->mmio, XE2_TDF_CTRL, TRANSIENT_FLUSH_REQUEST, 0,
> 150, NULL, false))
> xe_gt_err_once(gt, "TD flush timeout\n");
>
> @@ -889,9 +886,9 @@ void xe_device_l2_flush(struct xe_device *xe)
> return;
>
> spin_lock(>->global_invl_lock);
> - xe_mmio_write32(gt, XE2_GLOBAL_INVAL, 0x1);
> + xe_mmio_write32(>->mmio, XE2_GLOBAL_INVAL, 0x1);
>
> - if (xe_mmio_wait32(gt, XE2_GLOBAL_INVAL, 0x1, 0x0, 150, NULL, true))
> + if (xe_mmio_wait32(>->mmio, XE2_GLOBAL_INVAL, 0x1, 0x0, 150, NULL, true))
> xe_gt_err_once(gt, "Global invalidation timeout\n");
> spin_unlock(>->global_invl_lock);
>
> --
> 2.45.2
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list