✓ CI.checkpatch: success for drm/xe/vram: fix ccs offset calculation (rev2)

Patchwork patchwork at emeril.freedesktop.org
Fri Sep 13 13:54:56 UTC 2024


== Series Details ==

Series: drm/xe/vram: fix ccs offset calculation (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/138646/
State : success

== Summary ==

+ KERNEL=/kernel
+ git clone https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/maintainer-tools mt
Cloning into 'mt'...
warning: redirecting to https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/maintainer-tools.git/
+ git -C mt rev-list -n1 origin/master
c62d7e164862503a3662a095da1c6c9014248cb2
+ cd /kernel
+ git config --global --add safe.directory /kernel
+ git log -n1
commit 34da7405b703ab8a6a458061d599dc60d8c2c2d8
Author: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
Date:   Fri Sep 13 13:00:24 2024 +0100

    drm/xe/vram: fix ccs offset calculation
    
    Spec says SW is expected to round up to the nearest 128K, if not already
    aligned for the CC unit view of CCS. We are seeing the assert sometimes
    pop on BMG to tell us that there is a hole between GSM and CCS, as well
    as popping other asserts with having a vram size with strange alignment,
    which is likely caused by misaligned offset here.
    
    BSpec: 68023
    Fixes: b5c2ca0372dc ("drm/xe/xe2hpg: Determine flat ccs offset for vram")
    Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
    Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray at intel.com>
    Cc: Akshata Jahagirdar <akshata.jahagirdar at intel.com>
    Cc: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin at intel.com>
    Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
    Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org> # v6.10+
    Reviewed-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray at intel.com>
+ /mt/dim checkpatch ceffbbae8df33f194ae06e0174dfb0a7d726b2f7 drm-intel
34da7405b703 drm/xe/vram: fix ccs offset calculation




More information about the Intel-xe mailing list