[PATCH 4/7] drm/xe/oa: Signal output fences
Matthew Brost
matthew.brost at intel.com
Tue Sep 17 23:38:43 UTC 2024
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 03:18:03PM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 15:16:15 -0700, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
> >
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> > Introduce 'struct xe_oa_fence' which includes the dma_fence used to signal
> > output fences in the xe_sync array. The fences are signaled
> > asynchronously. When there are no output fences to signal, the OA
> > configuration wait is synchronously re-introduced into the ioctl.
> >
> > v2: Don't wait in the work, use callback + delayed work (Matt B)
> > Use a single, not a per-fence spinlock (Matt Brost)
>
> Want to check with you about this "single, not per-fence spinlock" issue
> below.
>
> > v3: Move ofence alloc before job submission (Matt)
> > Assert, don't fail, from dma_fence_add_callback (Matt)
> > Additional dma_fence_get for dma_fence_wait (Matt)
> > Change dma_fence_wait to non-interruptible (Matt)
> > v4: Introduce last_fence to prevent uaf if stream is closed with
> > pending OA config jobs
> >
> > Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h | 6 ++
> > 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> > index b4b68019d35b7..56f95fd431bf9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> > @@ -100,6 +100,15 @@ struct xe_oa_config_bo {
> > struct xe_bb *bb;
> > };
> >
> > +struct xe_oa_fence {
> > + /* @base: dma fence base */
> > + struct dma_fence base;
> > + /* @work: work to signal @base */
> > + struct delayed_work work;
> > + /* @cb: callback to schedule @work */
> > + struct dma_fence_cb cb;
> > +};
> > +
> > #define DRM_FMT(x) DRM_XE_OA_FMT_TYPE_##x
> >
> > static const struct xe_oa_format oa_formats[] = {
> > @@ -172,10 +181,10 @@ static struct xe_oa_config *xe_oa_get_oa_config(struct xe_oa *oa, int metrics_se
> > return oa_config;
> > }
> >
> > -static void free_oa_config_bo(struct xe_oa_config_bo *oa_bo)
> > +static void free_oa_config_bo(struct xe_oa_config_bo *oa_bo, struct dma_fence *last_fence)
> > {
> > xe_oa_config_put(oa_bo->oa_config);
> > - xe_bb_free(oa_bo->bb, NULL);
> > + xe_bb_free(oa_bo->bb, last_fence);
> > kfree(oa_bo);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -648,7 +657,8 @@ static void xe_oa_free_configs(struct xe_oa_stream *stream)
> >
> > xe_oa_config_put(stream->oa_config);
> > llist_for_each_entry_safe(oa_bo, tmp, stream->oa_config_bos.first, node)
> > - free_oa_config_bo(oa_bo);
> > + free_oa_config_bo(oa_bo, stream->last_fence);
> > + dma_fence_put(stream->last_fence);
> > }
> >
> > static void xe_oa_store_flex(struct xe_oa_stream *stream, struct xe_lrc *lrc,
> > @@ -945,40 +955,112 @@ xe_oa_alloc_config_buffer(struct xe_oa_stream *stream, struct xe_oa_config *oa_c
> > return oa_bo;
> > }
> >
> > +static void xe_oa_update_last_fence(struct xe_oa_stream *stream, struct dma_fence *fence)
> > +{
> > + dma_fence_put(stream->last_fence);
> > + stream->last_fence = dma_fence_get(fence);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void xe_oa_fence_work_fn(struct work_struct *w)
> > +{
> > + struct xe_oa_fence *ofence = container_of(w, typeof(*ofence), work.work);
> > +
> > + /* Signal fence to indicate new OA configuration is active */
> > + dma_fence_signal(&ofence->base);
> > + dma_fence_put(&ofence->base);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void xe_oa_config_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
> > +{
> > + /* Additional empirical delay needed for NOA programming after registers are written */
> > +#define NOA_PROGRAM_ADDITIONAL_DELAY_US 500
> > +
> > + struct xe_oa_fence *ofence = container_of(cb, typeof(*ofence), cb);
> > +
> > + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ofence->work, xe_oa_fence_work_fn);
> > + queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &ofence->work,
> > + usecs_to_jiffies(NOA_PROGRAM_ADDITIONAL_DELAY_US));
> > + dma_fence_put(fence);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const char *xe_oa_get_driver_name(struct dma_fence *fence)
> > +{
> > + return "xe_oa";
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const char *xe_oa_get_timeline_name(struct dma_fence *fence)
> > +{
> > + return "unbound";
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct dma_fence_ops xe_oa_fence_ops = {
> > + .get_driver_name = xe_oa_get_driver_name,
> > + .get_timeline_name = xe_oa_get_timeline_name,
> > +};
> > +
> > static int xe_oa_emit_oa_config(struct xe_oa_stream *stream, struct xe_oa_config *config)
> > {
> > #define NOA_PROGRAM_ADDITIONAL_DELAY_US 500
> > struct xe_oa_config_bo *oa_bo;
> > - int err = 0, us = NOA_PROGRAM_ADDITIONAL_DELAY_US;
> > + struct xe_oa_fence *ofence;
> > + int i, err, num_signal = 0;
> > struct dma_fence *fence;
> > - long timeout;
> >
> > - /* Emit OA configuration batch */
> > + ofence = kzalloc(sizeof(*ofence), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!ofence) {
> > + err = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto exit;
> > + }
> > +
> > oa_bo = xe_oa_alloc_config_buffer(stream, config);
> > if (IS_ERR(oa_bo)) {
> > err = PTR_ERR(oa_bo);
> > goto exit;
> > }
> >
> > + /* Emit OA configuration batch */
> > fence = xe_oa_submit_bb(stream, XE_OA_SUBMIT_ADD_DEPS, oa_bo->bb);
> > if (IS_ERR(fence)) {
> > err = PTR_ERR(fence);
> > goto exit;
> > }
> >
> > - /* Wait till all previous batches have executed */
> > - timeout = dma_fence_wait_timeout(fence, false, 5 * HZ);
> > - dma_fence_put(fence);
> > - if (timeout < 0)
> > - err = timeout;
> > - else if (!timeout)
> > - err = -ETIME;
> > - if (err)
> > - drm_dbg(&stream->oa->xe->drm, "dma_fence_wait_timeout err %d\n", err);
> > + /* Point of no return: initialize and set fence to signal */
> > + dma_fence_init(&ofence->base, &xe_oa_fence_ops, &stream->oa_fence_lock, 0, 0);
>
> About stream->oa_fence_lock. This was added in response to this comment
> from you in v1 of this patch:
>
> /* No per fence spin lock, global OA one for user_signal */
>
> here:
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/607602/?series=137058&rev=1#comment_1104327
>
> However, I just realized that, the way it is implemented, there is a uaf
> here: lock memory can be freed before the lock is accessed in
> dma_fence_signal() in xe_oa_fence_work_fn() (when the oa stream is
> destroyed).
>
> Of course we can implement some reference counting etc. to solve the uaf,
> but the simplest way to solve it seems to be to go back to the per-fence
> lock, unless doing so is incorrect? Looking at dma_fence_init calls, I do
> see per fence locks being used occasionally (xe_preempt_fence, vgem_fence
> etc.).
>
> So just want to check with you if it's ok to go back to the per fence lock,
> or we should solve it some other way.
>
Yea my bad on that suggestion. That is an issue, just move the lock back
to the fence.
Matt
> Thanks.
> --
> Ashutosh
>
> >
> > - /* Additional empirical delay needed for NOA programming after registers are written */
> > - usleep_range(us, 2 * us);
> > + for (i = 0; i < stream->num_syncs; i++) {
> > + if (stream->syncs[i].flags & DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL)
> > + num_signal++;
> > + xe_sync_entry_signal(&stream->syncs[i], &ofence->base);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Additional dma_fence_get in case we dma_fence_wait */
> > + if (!num_signal)
> > + dma_fence_get(&ofence->base);
> > +
> > + /* Update last fence too before adding callback */
> > + xe_oa_update_last_fence(stream, fence);
> > +
> > + /* Add job fence callback to schedule work to signal ofence->base */
> > + err = dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &ofence->cb, xe_oa_config_cb);
> > + xe_gt_assert(stream->gt, !err || err == -ENOENT);
> > + if (err == -ENOENT)
> > + xe_oa_config_cb(fence, &ofence->cb);
> > +
> > + /* If nothing needs to be signaled we wait synchronously */
> > + if (!num_signal) {
> > + dma_fence_wait(&ofence->base, false);
> > + dma_fence_put(&ofence->base);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Done with syncs */
> > + for (i = 0; i < stream->num_syncs; i++)
> > + xe_sync_entry_cleanup(&stream->syncs[i]);
> > + kfree(stream->syncs);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > exit:
> > + kfree(ofence);
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1479,6 +1561,7 @@ static int xe_oa_stream_init(struct xe_oa_stream *stream,
> > goto err_free_oa_buf;
> > }
> >
> > + spin_lock_init(&stream->oa_fence_lock);
> > ret = xe_oa_enable_metric_set(stream);
> > if (ret) {
> > drm_dbg(&stream->oa->xe->drm, "Unable to enable metric set\n");
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h
> > index 99f4b2d4bdcf6..935f98772a948 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h
> > @@ -239,6 +239,12 @@ struct xe_oa_stream {
> > /** @no_preempt: Whether preemption and timeslicing is disabled for stream exec_q */
> > u32 no_preempt;
> >
> > + /** @last_fence: fence to use in stream destroy when needed */
> > + struct dma_fence *last_fence;
> > +
> > + /** @oa_fence_lock: Lock for struct xe_oa_fence */
> > + spinlock_t oa_fence_lock;
> > +
> > /** @num_syncs: size of @syncs array */
> > u32 num_syncs;
> >
> > --
> > 2.41.0
> >
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list