[PATCH 3/4] drm/xe/vf: Start post-migration fixups with GuC MMIO handshake
Michal Wajdeczko
michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Mon Sep 23 12:02:39 UTC 2024
On 21.09.2024 00:29, Tomasz Lis wrote:
> During post-migration recovery, only MMIO communication to GuC is
> allowed. But that communication requires initialization.
shouldn't this be patch 2/4 ie. before actually trying to send anything
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
> index 459fa936aaba..3cea2d21525f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,36 @@ void xe_sriov_vf_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
> INIT_WORK(&xe->sriov.vf.migration_worker, migration_worker_func);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * vf_post_migration_reinit_guc - Re-initialize GuC communication.
> + * @xe: the &xe_device struct instance
> + *
> + * After migration, we need to reestablish communication with GuC and
> + * re-query all VF configuration to make sure they match previous
> + * provisioning. Note that most of VF provisioning shall be the same,
> + * except GGTT range, since GGTT is not virtualized per-VF.
> + *
> + * Returns: 0 if the operation completed successfully, or a negative error
correct tag is "Return:" see [1]
[1] https://docs.kernel.org/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html#function-documentation
> + * code otherwise.
> + */
> +static int vf_post_migration_reinit_guc(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *gt;
> + unsigned int id;
> + int err, ret;
> +
> + err = 0;
> + xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
again, maybe PM can be done once in vf_post_migration_recovery()
> + for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> + ret = xe_gt_sriov_vf_bootstrap(gt);
> + if (!err)
> + err = ret;
> + }
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +
> + return err;
do we care about sending a reset to those GuCs that successfully
completed handshake or we assume that going wedge is sufficient?
> +}
> +
> /*
> * vf_post_migration_notify_resfix_done - Notify all GuCs about resource fixups apply finished.
> * @xe: the &xe_device struct instance
> @@ -44,10 +74,20 @@ static void vf_post_migration_notify_resfix_done(struct xe_device *xe)
>
> static void vf_post_migration_recovery(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> + int err;
> +
> drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "migration recovery in progress\n");
> + err = vf_post_migration_reinit_guc(xe);
> + if (unlikely(err))
> + goto fail;
> +
> /* FIXME: add the recovery steps */
> vf_post_migration_notify_resfix_done(xe);
> drm_notice(&xe->drm, "migration recovery completed\n");
> + return;
> +fail:
> + drm_err(&xe->drm, "migration recovery failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(err));
> + xe_device_declare_wedged(xe);
> }
>
> static void migration_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list