[PATCH v4 1/1] drm/xe: Prevent null pointer access in xe_migrate_copy
Dong, Zhanjun
zhanjun.dong at intel.com
Mon Sep 30 13:31:34 UTC 2024
If no more concerns, may I start the process to merge this patch?
Regards,
Zhanjun Dong
On 2024-09-30 3:46 a.m., Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 27/09/2024 17:43, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>> On Fri, 2024-09-27 at 17:34 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
>>> On 27/09/2024 17:13, Zhanjun Dong wrote:
>>>> xe_migrate_copy designed to copy content of TTM resources. When
>>>> source
>>>> resource is null, it will trigger a NULL pointer dereference in
>>>> xe_migrate_copy. To avoid this situation, update lacks source flag
>>>> to
>>>> true for this case, the flag will trigger xe_migrate_clear rather
>>>> than
>>>> xe_migrate_copy.
>>>>
>>>> Issue trace:
>>>> <7> [317.089847] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm:xe_migrate_copy [xe]] Pass
>>>> 14,
>>>> sizes: 4194304 & 4194304
>>>> <7> [317.089945] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm:xe_migrate_copy [xe]] Pass
>>>> 15,
>>>> sizes: 4194304 & 4194304
>>>> <1> [317.128055] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
>>>> 0000000000000010
>>>> <1> [317.128064] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
>>>> <1> [317.128066] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
>>>> <6> [317.128069] PGD 0 P4D 0
>>>> <4> [317.128071] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
>>>> <4> [317.128074] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1440 Comm: kunit_try_catch
>>>> Tainted:
>>>> G U N 6.11.0-rc7-xe #1
>>>> <4> [317.128078] Tainted: [U]=USER, [N]=TEST
>>>> <4> [317.128080] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Lunar Lake Client
>>>> Platform/LNL-M LP5 RVP1, BIOS LNLMFWI1.R00.3221.D80.2407291239
>>>> 07/29/2024
>>>> <4> [317.128082] RIP: 0010:xe_migrate_copy+0x66/0x13e0 [xe]
>>>> <4> [317.128158] Code: 00 00 48 89 8d e0 fe ff ff 48 8b 40 10 4c 89
>>>> 85 c8
>>>> fe ff ff 44 88 8d bd fe ff ff 65 48 8b 3c 25 28 00 00 00 48 89 7d
>>>> d0 31
>>>> ff <8b> 79 10 48 89 85 a0 fe ff ff 48 8b 00 48 89 b5 d8 fe ff ff
>>>> 83 ff
>>>> <4> [317.128162] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000167f9f0 EFLAGS: 00010246
>>>> <4> [317.128164] RAX: ffff8881120d8028 RBX: ffff88814d070428 RCX:
>>>> 0000000000000000
>>>> <4> [317.128166] RDX: ffff88813cb99c00 RSI: 0000000004000000 RDI:
>>>> 0000000000000000
>>>> <4> [317.128168] RBP: ffffc9000167fbb8 R08: ffff88814e7b1f08 R09:
>>>> 0000000000000001
>>>> <4> [317.128170] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12:
>>>> ffff88814e7b1f08
>>>> <4> [317.128172] R13: ffff88814e7b1f08 R14: ffff88813cb99c00 R15:
>>>> 0000000000000001
>>>> <4> [317.128174] FS: 0000000000000000(0000)
>>>> GS:ffff88846f280000(0000)
>>>> knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>> <4> [317.128176] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>>> <4> [317.128178] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 000000011f676004 CR4:
>>>> 0000000000770ef0
>>>> <4> [317.128180] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
>>>> 0000000000000000
>>>> <4> [317.128182] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff07f0 DR7:
>>>> 0000000000000400
>>>> <4> [317.128184] PKRU: 55555554
>>>> <4> [317.128185] Call Trace:
>>>> <4> [317.128187] <TASK>
>>>> <4> [317.128189] ? show_regs+0x67/0x70
>>>> <4> [317.128194] ? __die_body+0x20/0x70
>>>> <4> [317.128196] ? __die+0x2b/0x40
>>>> <4> [317.128198] ? page_fault_oops+0x15f/0x4e0
>>>> <4> [317.128203] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x3fb/0x970
>>>> <4> [317.128205] ? lock_acquire+0xc7/0x2e0
>>>> <4> [317.128209] ? exc_page_fault+0x87/0x2b0
>>>> <4> [317.128212] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30
>>>> <4> [317.128216] ? xe_migrate_copy+0x66/0x13e0 [xe]
>>>> <4> [317.128263] ? __lock_acquire+0xb9d/0x26f0
>>>> <4> [317.128265] ? __lock_acquire+0xb9d/0x26f0
>>>> <4> [317.128267] ? sg_free_append_table+0x20/0x80
>>>> <4> [317.128271] ? lock_acquire+0xc7/0x2e0
>>>> <4> [317.128273] ? mark_held_locks+0x4d/0x80
>>>> <4> [317.128275] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1e/0xd0
>>>> <4> [317.128278] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x31/0x60
>>>> <4> [317.128281] ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x60/0xa0
>>>> <4> [317.128284] xe_bo_move+0x682/0xc50 [xe]
>>>> <4> [317.128315] ? lock_is_held_type+0xaa/0x120
>>>> <4> [317.128318] ttm_bo_handle_move_mem+0xe5/0x1a0 [ttm]
>>>> <4> [317.128324] ttm_bo_validate+0xd1/0x1a0 [ttm]
>>>> <4> [317.128328] shrink_test_run_device+0x721/0xc10 [xe]
>>>> <4> [317.128360] ? find_held_lock+0x31/0x90
>>>> <4> [317.128363] ? lock_release+0xd1/0x2a0
>>>> <4> [317.128365] ?
>>>> __pfx_kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x10/0x10
>>>> [kunit]
>>>> <4> [317.128370] xe_bo_shrink_kunit+0x11/0x20 [xe]
>>>> <4> [317.128397] kunit_try_run_case+0x6e/0x150 [kunit]
>>>> <4> [317.128400] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1e/0xd0
>>>> <4> [317.128402] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x31/0x60
>>>> <4> [317.128404] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x1e/0x40
>>>> [kunit]
>>>> <4> [317.128407] kthread+0xf5/0x130
>>>> <4> [317.128410] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
>>>> <4> [317.128412] ret_from_fork+0x39/0x60
>>>> <4> [317.128415] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
>>>> <4> [317.128416] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>>>> <4> [317.128420] </TASK>
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 266c85885263 ("drm/xe/xe2: Handle flat ccs move for igfx.")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong at intel.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 4 ++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
>>>> index 5f2f1ec46b57..5e8f60a8d431 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
>>>> @@ -682,8 +682,8 @@ static int xe_bo_move(struct ttm_buffer_object
>>>> *ttm_bo, bool evict,
>>>> tt_has_data = ttm && (ttm_tt_is_populated(ttm) ||
>>>> (ttm->page_flags &
>>>> TTM_TT_FLAG_SWAPPED));
>>>> - move_lacks_source = handle_system_ccs ? (!bo-
>>>>> ccs_cleared) :
>>>> -
>>>> (!mem_type_is_vram(old_mem_type) &&
>>>> !tt_has_data);
>>>> + move_lacks_source = !old_mem || (handle_system_ccs ? (!bo-
>>>>> ccs_cleared) :
>>>> +
>>>> (!mem_type_is_vram(old_mem_type) && !tt_has_data));
>>>
>>> So is the issue us leaving bo->ccs_cleared set, even after purging
>>> the
>>> object? Seems like when purging the object the bo->ccs_cleared should
>>> be
>>> reset since backing storage is now gone? If we ever have purging for
>>> real userspace stuff we probably need that anyway.
>>
>> Hmm, good point. But is purging removing the bo->resource. I guess it
>> does....
>
> Yeah, AFAICT the bo->resource gets set back to NULL. So seems like we
> can get NULL resource from initial creation and now also after pipeline
> gutting.
>
>>
>> /Thomas
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> needs_clear = (ttm && ttm->page_flags &
>>>> TTM_TT_FLAG_ZERO_ALLOC) ||
>>>> (!ttm && ttm_bo->type == ttm_bo_type_device);
>>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list