[PATCH v6 04/25] drm/xe: Modify xe_force_wake_put to handle _get returned mask
Michal Wajdeczko
michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Mon Sep 30 20:13:19 UTC 2024
On 30.09.2024 07:31, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
> Instead of calling xe_force_wake_put on all domains that were input to
> xe_force_wake_get, call _put only on the domains whose reference counts
> were successfully incremented by the _get call. Since the return value
> of _get can be a mask that does not match any specific value in the enum
> xe_force_wake_domains, change the input parameter of _put to unsigned int.
at this point in the series xe_force_wake_get() still returns errno
maybe rephrase this to something like:
"Prepare xe_force_wake_put() to accept force_wake reference with
refcounted domains"
and also maybe it is a good time to change this function to void (or
maybe even do it before this path?
>
> v3
> - Move WARN to this patch (Badal)
> - use xe_gt_WARN instead of XE_WARN (Michal)
> - Stop using xe_force_wake_domains for non enum values.
> - Remove kernel-doc from this patch (Badal)
>
> -v5
> - Fix global awake_domain
>
> -v6
> - put all initialized domains in case of FORCEWAKE_ALL.
> - Modify ret variable name (Michal)
> - Modify input var name (Michal)
> - Modify commit message and warn (Badal)
>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar at intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das at intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar at intel.com>
probably this applies to some earlier #rev, so please mark it as such
> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> index 7f358e42c5d4..372ea43b0d06 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> @@ -211,26 +211,40 @@ unsigned int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> }
>
> int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> - enum xe_force_wake_domains domains)
> + unsigned int fw_ref)
> {
> struct xe_gt *gt = fw->gt;
> struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain;
> - enum xe_force_wake_domains tmp, sleep = 0;
> + unsigned int tmp, sleep = 0;
> unsigned long flags;
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ack_fail = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Avoid unnecessary lock and unlock when the function is called
> + * in error path of individual domains.
> + */
> + if (!fw_ref)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (fw_ref == XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL)
> + fw_ref = fw->initialized_domains;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&fw->lock, flags);
> - for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, domains, fw, tmp) {
> + for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, fw_ref, fw, tmp) {
> if (!--domain->ref) {
> sleep |= BIT(domain->id);
> domain_sleep(gt, domain);
> }
> }
> for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, sleep, fw, tmp) {
> - ret |= domain_sleep_wait(gt, domain);
> + if (domain_sleep_wait(gt, domain) == 0)
> + fw->awake_domains &= ~BIT(domain->id);
> + else
> + ack_fail |= BIT(domain->id);
> }
> - fw->awake_domains &= ~sleep;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fw->lock, flags);
>
> - return ret;
> + xe_gt_WARN(gt, ack_fail, "Forcewake domain%s %#x failed to acknowledge sleep request\n",
> + str_plural(hweight_long(ack_fail)), ack_fail);
> + return ack_fail;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
> index eb638128952d..b5a75544d86a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt,
> unsigned int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
> int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> - enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
> + unsigned int fw_ref);
>
> static inline int
> xe_force_wake_ref(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list