[PATCH v4 1/9] drm/xe/xelpg: Move Wa_14016712196 to the invalidate path

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at igalia.com
Tue Apr 1 08:46:34 UTC 2025


On 31/03/2025 19:54, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 04:35:28PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> According to i915 Wa_14016712196 needs to be emmited before a
>> pipe control which contains a post sync operation.
>>
>> Therefore move it from flush (no post sync) to invalidate (post sync).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at igalia.com>
>> Fixes: 8c5fe7d88bc1 ("drm/xe: Add Wa_16021333562 and Wa_14016712196")
>> Cc: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay at intel.com>
>> Cc: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia at intel.com>
>> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
>> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>> ---
>> Please double check.
> 
> It looks like both options are possible.
> 
> We either insert a PIPE_CONTROL with "**Depth Flush** " post any state that
>     will send an implicit depth flush and prior to any PIPE_CONTROL. This
>     PIPE_CONTROL is not required if 3DPRIMITIVE, 3DMESH or PIPE_CONTROL that
>     doesn't require end of the pipe drain is programmed prior to a PIPE_CONTROL
>     that requires end of the pipe drain and hits this issue.
> 
> or
> 
> We insert a this pipe_control prior to PIPE_CONTROL which will hit the issue.  For
>     timestamp, this could be a replicated pipe_control as it will write the
>     correct value the 2nd time.  For post sync with write immediate, SW would have
>     to allocate a dummy address.
> 
> So, is changing the order really helping your case or needed for your case?

No, I don't have access to Meteorlake so I was just comparing all the 
differences between i915 and xe in this area. Given Juha-Pekka reported 
the previous version of this series did not work there. I suspect that 
problem was I simply miscounted MAX_JOB_SIZE_DW. That should be fixed in 
this v4. So yeah, if you say this patch is wrong or not needed I will 
drop it.

Regards,

Tvrtko

>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c | 16 +++++++++-------
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
>> index 917fc16de866..88591b7a7715 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
>> @@ -134,8 +134,9 @@ emit_pipe_control(u32 *dw, int i, u32 bit_group_0, u32 bit_group_1, u32 offset,
>>   	return i;
>>   }
>>   
>> -static int emit_pipe_invalidate(u32 mask_flags, bool invalidate_tlb, u32 *dw,
>> -				int i)
>> +static int
>> +emit_pipe_invalidate(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 mask_flags, bool invalidate_tlb,
>> +		     u32 *dw, int i)
>>   {
>>   	u32 flags = PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL |
>>   		PIPE_CONTROL_COMMAND_CACHE_INVALIDATE |
>> @@ -152,6 +153,10 @@ static int emit_pipe_invalidate(u32 mask_flags, bool invalidate_tlb, u32 *dw,
>>   
>>   	flags &= ~mask_flags;
>>   
>> +	if (XE_WA(gt, 14016712196))
>> +		i = emit_pipe_control(dw, i, 0, PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH,
>> +				      LRC_PPHWSP_FLUSH_INVAL_SCRATCH_ADDR, 0);
>> +
>>   	return emit_pipe_control(dw, i, 0, flags, LRC_PPHWSP_FLUSH_INVAL_SCRATCH_ADDR, 0);
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -173,10 +178,6 @@ static int emit_render_cache_flush(struct xe_sched_job *job, u32 *dw, int i)
>>   	bool lacks_render = !(gt->info.engine_mask & XE_HW_ENGINE_RCS_MASK);
>>   	u32 flags;
>>   
>> -	if (XE_WA(gt, 14016712196))
>> -		i = emit_pipe_control(dw, i, 0, PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH,
>> -				      LRC_PPHWSP_FLUSH_INVAL_SCRATCH_ADDR, 0);
>> -
>>   	flags = (PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL |
>>   		 PIPE_CONTROL_TILE_CACHE_FLUSH |
>>   		 PIPE_CONTROL_RENDER_TARGET_CACHE_FLUSH |
>> @@ -361,7 +362,8 @@ static void __emit_job_gen12_render_compute(struct xe_sched_job *job,
>>   		mask_flags = PIPE_CONTROL_3D_ENGINE_FLAGS;
>>   
>>   	/* See __xe_pt_bind_vma() for a discussion on TLB invalidations. */
>> -	i = emit_pipe_invalidate(mask_flags, job->ring_ops_flush_tlb, dw, i);
>> +	i = emit_pipe_invalidate(gt, mask_flags, job->ring_ops_flush_tlb, dw,
>> +				 i);
>>   
>>   	/* hsdes: 1809175790 */
>>   	if (has_aux_ccs(xe))
>> -- 
>> 2.48.0
>>



More information about the Intel-xe mailing list