[PATCH v16 3/5] drm/xe/uapi: Define drm_xe_vm_get_property

Jianxun Zhang jianxun.zhang at intel.com
Thu Apr 3 01:19:42 UTC 2025



On 4/1/25 15:26, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
> Add initial declarations for the drm_xe_vm_get_property ioctl.
> 
> v2:
> - Expand kernel docs for drm_xe_vm_get_property (Jianxun)
> 
> v3:
> - Remove address type external definitions (Jianxun)
> - Add fault type to xe_drm_fault struct (Jianxun)
> 
> v4:
> - Remove engine class and instance (Ivan)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt at intel.com>
> Cc: Zhang Jianxun <jianxun.zhang at intel.com>
> Cc: Ivan Briano <ivan.briano at intel.com>
> ---
>   include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> index 616916985e3f..45f7560879cb 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ extern "C" {
>    *  - &DRM_IOCTL_XE_EXEC
>    *  - &DRM_IOCTL_XE_WAIT_USER_FENCE
>    *  - &DRM_IOCTL_XE_OBSERVATION
> + *  - &DRM_IOCTL_XE_VM_GET_PROPERTY
>    */
>   
>   /*
> @@ -102,6 +103,7 @@ extern "C" {
>   #define DRM_XE_EXEC			0x09
>   #define DRM_XE_WAIT_USER_FENCE		0x0a
>   #define DRM_XE_OBSERVATION		0x0b
> +#define DRM_XE_VM_GET_PROPERTY		0x0c
>   
>   /* Must be kept compact -- no holes */
>   
> @@ -117,6 +119,7 @@ extern "C" {
>   #define DRM_IOCTL_XE_EXEC			DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_XE_EXEC, struct drm_xe_exec)
>   #define DRM_IOCTL_XE_WAIT_USER_FENCE		DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_XE_WAIT_USER_FENCE, struct drm_xe_wait_user_fence)
>   #define DRM_IOCTL_XE_OBSERVATION		DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_XE_OBSERVATION, struct drm_xe_observation_param)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_XE_VM_GET_PROPERTY	DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_XE_VM_GET_PROPERTY, struct drm_xe_vm_get_property)
>   
>   /**
>    * DOC: Xe IOCTL Extensions
> @@ -1189,6 +1192,78 @@ struct drm_xe_vm_bind {
>   	__u64 reserved[2];
>   };
>   
> +/** struct xe_vm_fault - Describes faults for %DRM_XE_VM_GET_PROPERTY_FAULTS */
> +struct xe_vm_fault {
> +	/** @address: Address of the fault */
> +	__u64 address;
> +	/** @address_precision: Precision of faulted address */
> +	__u32 address_precision;
> +	/** @access_type: Type of address access that resulted in fault */
> +	__u8 access_type;
> +	/** @fault_type: Type of fault reported */
> +	__u8 fault_type;
> +	/** @fault_level: fault level of the fault */
> +	__u8 fault_level;
> +	/** @pad: MBZ */
> +	__u8 pad;
> +	/** @reserved: MBZ */
> +	__u64 reserved[4];
Why are engine class and instance gone? I think we got agreement on not 
reporting class 0x4, but the rest should be kept. If KMD can have these 
in dmesg, why can't we report these in VK report?
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct drm_xe_vm_get_property - Input of &DRM_IOCTL_XE_VM_GET_PROPERTY
> + *
> + * The user provides a VM and a property to query among DRM_XE_VM_GET_PROPERTY_*,
> + * and sets the values in the vm_id and property members, respectively.  This
> + * determines both the VM to get the property of, as well as the property to
> + * report.
> + *
> + * If size is set to 0, the driver fills it with the required size for the
> + * requested property.  The user is expected here to allocate memory for the
> + * property structure and to provide a pointer to the allocated memory using the
> + * data member.  For some properties, this may be zero, in which case, the
> + * value of the property will be saved to the value member and size will remain
> + * zero on return.
> + *
> + * If size is not zero, then the IOCTL will attempt to copy the requested
> + * property into the data member.
> + *
> + * The IOCTL will return -ENOENT if the VM could not be identified from the
> + * provided VM ID, or -EINVAL if the IOCTL fails for any other reason, such as
> + * providing an invalid size for the given property or if the property data
> + * could not be copied to the memory allocated to the data member.
> + *
> + * The property member can be:
> + *  - %DRM_XE_VM_GET_PROPERTY_FAULTS
> + */
> +struct drm_xe_vm_get_property {
> +	/** @extensions: Pointer to the first extension struct, if any */
> +	__u64 extensions;
> +
> +	/** @vm_id: The ID of the VM to query the properties of */
> +	__u32 vm_id;
> +
> +#define DRM_XE_VM_GET_PROPERTY_FAULTS		0
> +	/** @property: property to get */
> +	__u32 property;
> +
> +	/** @size: Size to allocate for @data */
> +	__u32 size;
> +
> +	/** @pad: MBZ */
> +	__u32 pad;
> +
> +	union {
> +		/** @data: Pointer to user-defined array of flexible size and type */
> +		__u64 data;
> +		/** @value: Return value for scalar queries */
> +		__u64 value;
> +	};
> +
> +	/** @reserved: MBZ */
> +	__u64 reserved[3];
> +};
> +
>   /**
>    * struct drm_xe_exec_queue_create - Input of &DRM_IOCTL_XE_EXEC_QUEUE_CREATE
>    *



More information about the Intel-xe mailing list