Bumping this since I just discovered something. On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 03:26:30PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote: ... > +#define PCODE_SCRATCH(x) XE_REG(0x138320 + ((x) * 4)) If we're referring to PCODE_FIT_DATA_0_2_0_GTTMMADR[0], it actually starts from 0x138300. Anything to worry about here? Raag