[PATCH v2 7/7] drm/xe/pt: unify xe_pt_svm_pre_commit with userptr
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Mon Apr 7 07:29:11 UTC 2025
On 04/04/2025 18:02, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 09:19:34AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
>> On 03/04/2025 22:25, Matthew Brost wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 06:10:36PM +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
>>>> We now use the same notifier lock for SVM and userptr, with that we can
>>>> combine xe_pt_userptr_pre_commit and xe_pt_svm_pre_commit.
>>>>
>>>> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray at intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 95 +++++++++++++-------------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
>>>> index b097c91e2e02..947b82aa19a6 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
>>>> @@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ static int op_check_userptr(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_vma_op *op,
>>>> return err;
>>>> }
>>>> -static int xe_pt_userptr_pre_commit(struct xe_migrate_pt_update *pt_update)
>>>> +static int xe_pt_svm_userptr_pre_commit(struct xe_migrate_pt_update *pt_update)
>>>> {
>>>> struct xe_vm *vm = pt_update->vops->vm;
>>>> struct xe_vma_ops *vops = pt_update->vops;
>>>> @@ -1409,55 +1409,40 @@ static int xe_pt_userptr_pre_commit(struct xe_migrate_pt_update *pt_update)
>>>> if (err)
>>>> return err;
>>>> - down_read(&vm->svm.gpusvm.notifier_lock);
>>>> + drm_gpusvm_notifier_lock(&vm->svm.gpusvm);
>>>
>>> Also any reason not use xe_svm_notifier_lock / xe_svm_notifier_unlock wrappers?
>>
>> Just that those are hidden behind CONFIG_DRM_XE_GPUSVM, so looks possible to
>> disable svm, but then I think we should still have working userptr. Should I
>> pull xe_svm_notifier_lock out of CONFIG_DRM_XE_GPUSVM?
>>
>
> How would userptr work without GPU SVM if we building it on top of it?
Here I mean CONFIG_DRM_*XE*_GPUSVM, which looks to be specific to
everything around xe_svm.c AFAICT, which useptr doesn't touch. We do now
ofc require DRM_GPUSVM by default, but that's a different config.
>
> Matt
>
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>> list_for_each_entry(op, &vops->list, link) {
>>>> - err = op_check_userptr(vm, op, pt_update_ops);
>>>> - if (err) {
>>>> - up_read(&vm->svm.gpusvm.notifier_lock);
>>>> - break;
>>>> + if (pt_update_ops->needs_svm_lock) {
>>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_GPUSVM)
>>>> + struct xe_svm_range *range = op->map_range.range;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (op->subop == XE_VMA_SUBOP_UNMAP_RANGE)
>>>> + continue;
>>>> +
>>>> + xe_svm_range_debug(range, "PRE-COMMIT");
>>>> +
>>>> + xe_assert(vm->xe,
>>>> + xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(op->map_range.vma));
>>>> + xe_assert(vm->xe, op->subop == XE_VMA_SUBOP_MAP_RANGE);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!xe_svm_range_pages_valid(range)) {
>>>> + xe_svm_range_debug(range, "PRE-COMMIT - RETRY");
>>>> + drm_gpusvm_notifier_unlock(&vm->svm.gpusvm);
>>>> + return -EAGAIN;
>>>> + }
>>>> +#endif
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + err = op_check_userptr(vm, op, pt_update_ops);
>>>> + if (err) {
>>>> + drm_gpusvm_notifier_unlock(&vm->svm.gpusvm);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> return err;
>>>> }
>>>> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_GPUSVM)
>>>> -static int xe_pt_svm_pre_commit(struct xe_migrate_pt_update *pt_update)
>>>> -{
>>>> - struct xe_vm *vm = pt_update->vops->vm;
>>>> - struct xe_vma_ops *vops = pt_update->vops;
>>>> - struct xe_vma_op *op;
>>>> - int err;
>>>> -
>>>> - err = xe_pt_pre_commit(pt_update);
>>>> - if (err)
>>>> - return err;
>>>> -
>>>> - xe_svm_notifier_lock(vm);
>>>> -
>>>> - list_for_each_entry(op, &vops->list, link) {
>>>> - struct xe_svm_range *range = op->map_range.range;
>>>> -
>>>> - if (op->subop == XE_VMA_SUBOP_UNMAP_RANGE)
>>>> - continue;
>>>> -
>>>> - xe_svm_range_debug(range, "PRE-COMMIT");
>>>> -
>>>> - xe_assert(vm->xe, xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(op->map_range.vma));
>>>> - xe_assert(vm->xe, op->subop == XE_VMA_SUBOP_MAP_RANGE);
>>>> -
>>>> - if (!xe_svm_range_pages_valid(range)) {
>>>> - xe_svm_range_debug(range, "PRE-COMMIT - RETRY");
>>>> - xe_svm_notifier_unlock(vm);
>>>> - return -EAGAIN;
>>>> - }
>>>> - }
>>>> -
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> -}
>>>> -#endif
>>>> -
>>>> struct invalidation_fence {
>>>> struct xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence base;
>>>> struct xe_gt *gt;
>>>> @@ -2255,22 +2240,12 @@ static const struct xe_migrate_pt_update_ops migrate_ops = {
>>>> .pre_commit = xe_pt_pre_commit,
>>>> };
>>>> -static const struct xe_migrate_pt_update_ops userptr_migrate_ops = {
>>>> +static const struct xe_migrate_pt_update_ops svm_userptr_migrate_ops = {
>>>> .populate = xe_vm_populate_pgtable,
>>>> .clear = xe_migrate_clear_pgtable_callback,
>>>> - .pre_commit = xe_pt_userptr_pre_commit,
>>>> + .pre_commit = xe_pt_svm_userptr_pre_commit,
>>>> };
>>>> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_GPUSVM)
>>>> -static const struct xe_migrate_pt_update_ops svm_migrate_ops = {
>>>> - .populate = xe_vm_populate_pgtable,
>>>> - .clear = xe_migrate_clear_pgtable_callback,
>>>> - .pre_commit = xe_pt_svm_pre_commit,
>>>> -};
>>>> -#else
>>>> -static const struct xe_migrate_pt_update_ops svm_migrate_ops;
>>>> -#endif
>>>> -
>>>> /**
>>>> * xe_pt_update_ops_run() - Run PT update operations
>>>> * @tile: Tile of PT update operations
>>>> @@ -2296,10 +2271,8 @@ xe_pt_update_ops_run(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma_ops *vops)
>>>> struct xe_vma_op *op;
>>>> int err = 0, i;
>>>> struct xe_migrate_pt_update update = {
>>>> - .ops = pt_update_ops->needs_svm_lock ?
>>>> - &svm_migrate_ops :
>>>> - pt_update_ops->needs_userptr_lock ?
>>>> - &userptr_migrate_ops :
>>>> + .ops = pt_update_ops->needs_svm_lock || pt_update_ops->needs_userptr_lock ?
>>>> + &svm_userptr_migrate_ops :
>>>> &migrate_ops,
>>>> .vops = vops,
>>>> .tile_id = tile->id,
>>>> @@ -2419,10 +2392,8 @@ xe_pt_update_ops_run(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma_ops *vops)
>>>> &ifence->base.base, &mfence->base.base);
>>>> }
>>>> - if (pt_update_ops->needs_svm_lock)
>>>> - xe_svm_notifier_unlock(vm);
>>>> - if (pt_update_ops->needs_userptr_lock)
>>>> - up_read(&vm->svm.gpusvm.notifier_lock);
>>>> + if (pt_update_ops->needs_svm_lock || pt_update_ops->needs_userptr_lock)
>>>> + drm_gpusvm_notifier_unlock(&vm->svm.gpusvm);
>>>> return fence;
>>>> --
>>>> 2.48.1
>>>>
>>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list