[PATCH v8 3/4] drm/xe/guc: Introduce enum with offsets for context register H2Gs

Tomasz Lis tomasz.lis at intel.com
Wed Apr 9 21:13:39 UTC 2025


Some GuC messages are constructed with incrementing dword counter
rather than referencing specific DWORDs, as described in GuC interface
specification.

This change introduces the definitions of DWORD numbers for parameters
which will need to be referenced in a CTB parser to be added in a
following patch. To ensure correctness of these DWORDs, verification
in form of asserts was added to the message construction code.

v2: Renamed enum members, added ones for single context registration,
  modified asserts to check values rather than indexes.
v3: Reordered assert args to take less lines

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis at intel.com>
Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c       | 17 ++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
index 448afb86e05c..64c71526356e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
@@ -161,6 +161,35 @@ enum xe_guc_preempt_options {
 	XE_GUC_PREEMPT_OPTION_DROP_SUBMIT_Q = 0x8,
 };
 
+enum xe_guc_register_context_param_offsets {
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_0_MBZ = 0,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_1_FLAGS,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_2_CONTEXT_INDEX,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_3_ENGINE_CLASS,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_4_ENGINE_SUBMIT_MASK,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_5_WQ_DESC_ADDR_LOWER,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_6_WQ_DESC_ADDR_UPPER,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_7_WQ_BUF_BASE_LOWER,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_8_WQ_BUF_BASE_UPPER,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_9_WQ_BUF_SIZE,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_10_HW_LRC_ADDR,
+};
+
+enum xe_guc_register_context_multi_lrc_param_offsets {
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_0_MBZ = 0,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_1_FLAGS,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_2_PARENT_CONTEXT,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_3_ENGINE_CLASS,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_4_ENGINE_SUBMIT_MASK,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_5_WQ_DESC_ADDR_LOWER,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_6_WQ_DESC_ADDR_UPPER,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_7_WQ_BUF_BASE_LOWER,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_8_WQ_BUF_BASE_UPPER,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_9_WQ_BUF_SIZE,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_10_NUM_CTXS,
+	XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_11_HW_LRC_ADDR,
+};
+
 enum xe_guc_report_status {
 	XE_GUC_REPORT_STATUS_UNKNOWN = 0x0,
 	XE_GUC_REPORT_STATUS_ACKED = 0x1,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
index 813c3c0bb250..cfc65f21b2f7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
@@ -487,6 +487,15 @@ static void __register_mlrc_exec_queue(struct xe_guc *guc,
 		action[len++] = upper_32_bits(xe_lrc_descriptor(lrc));
 	}
 
+	/* explicitly checks some fields that we might fixup later */
+	xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), info->wq_desc_lo ==
+		     action[XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_5_WQ_DESC_ADDR_LOWER]);
+	xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), info->wq_base_lo ==
+		     action[XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_7_WQ_BUF_BASE_LOWER]);
+	xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), q->width ==
+		     action[XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_10_NUM_CTXS]);
+	xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), info->hwlrca_lo ==
+		     action[XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_11_HW_LRC_ADDR]);
 	xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), len <= MAX_MLRC_REG_SIZE);
 #undef MAX_MLRC_REG_SIZE
 
@@ -511,6 +520,14 @@ static void __register_exec_queue(struct xe_guc *guc,
 		info->hwlrca_hi,
 	};
 
+	/* explicitly checks some fields that we might fixup later */
+	xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), info->wq_desc_lo ==
+		     action[XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_5_WQ_DESC_ADDR_LOWER]);
+	xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), info->wq_base_lo ==
+		     action[XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_7_WQ_BUF_BASE_LOWER]);
+	xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), info->hwlrca_lo ==
+		     action[XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_10_HW_LRC_ADDR]);
+
 	xe_guc_ct_send(&guc->ct, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, 0);
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1



More information about the Intel-xe mailing list