[PATCH v2 2/3] drm/xe: Expose PCIe Gen4 downspeed attributes
Riana Tauro
riana.tauro at intel.com
Wed Apr 16 10:06:55 UTC 2025
Hi Raag
On 4/3/2025 11:17 PM, Raag Jadav wrote:
> Expose sysfs attributes for PCIe Gen4 downspeed capability and status.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h | 5 ++
> 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c
> index d4c73acea1cf..4e6175907832 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@
>
> #include "xe_device.h"
> #include "xe_device_sysfs.h"
> +#include "xe_mmio.h"
> +#include "xe_pcode_api.h"
> +#include "xe_pcode.h"
> #include "xe_pm.h"
>
> /**
> @@ -63,12 +66,85 @@ vram_d3cold_threshold_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(vram_d3cold_threshold);
>
> +/**
> + * DOC: PCIe Gen5 Update Limitations
> + *
> + * Default link speed of discrete GPUs is determined by FIT parameters stored
> + * in their flash memory, which are subject to override through user initiated
> + * firmware updates. It has been observed that devices configured with PCIe
> + * Gen5 as their default speed can come across link quality issues due to host
> + * or motherboard limitations and may have to auto-downspeed to PCIe Gen4 when
> + * faced with unstable link at Gen5. The users are required to ensure that the
> + * device is capable of auto-downspeeding to PCIe Gen4 link before pushing the
> + * image with Gen5 as default configuration. This can be done by reading
> + * ``pcie_gen4_downspeed_capable`` sysfs entry, which will denote PCIe Gen4
> + * downspeed capability of the device with boolean output value of ``0`` or
> + * ``1``, meaning `incapable` or `capable` respectively.
> + *
> + * .. code-block:: shell
> + *
> + * $ cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/<bdf>/pcie_gen4_downspeed_capable
> + *
> + * Pushing PCIe Gen5 update on a downspeed incapable device and facing link
> + * instability due to host or motherboard limitations can result in driver not
> + * being able to successfully bind to the device, making further firmware
> + * updates impossible with RMA being the only last resort.
> + *
> + * Link downspeed status of PCIe Gen4 downspeed capable devices is available
> + * through ``pcie_gen4_downspeed_status`` sysfs entry with boolean output value
> + * of ``0`` or ``1``, where ``0`` means no auto-downspeeding was required during
> + * link training (which is the optimal scenario) and ``1`` means the device has
> + * auto-downsped to PCIe Gen4 due to unstable Gen5 link.
> + *
> + * .. code-block:: shell
> + *
> + * $ cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/<bdf>/pcie_gen4_downspeed_status
Why downspeed? Shouldn't it be downgrade?> + */
> +
> +static ssize_t
> +pcie_gen4_downspeed_capable_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> + struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
> + u32 cap, val;
> +
> + xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> + val = xe_mmio_read32(xe_root_tile_mmio(xe), BMG_PCIE4_CAP);
> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +
> + cap = REG_FIELD_GET(PCIE4_DOWNSPEED, val);
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", cap == DOWNSPEED_CAPABLE ? true : false);
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(pcie_gen4_downspeed_capable);
> +
> +static ssize_t
> +pcie_gen4_downspeed_status_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> + struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
> + u32 val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> + ret = xe_pcode_read(xe_device_get_root_tile(xe), PCODE_MBOX(DGFX_PCODE_STATUS,
> + DGFX_GET_INIT_STATUS, 0), &val, NULL);
indentation> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +
> + return ret ?: sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", REG_FIELD_GET(DGFX_PCIE4_DOWNSPEED_STATUS, val));
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(pcie_gen4_downspeed_status);
> +
> static void xe_device_sysfs_fini(void *arg)
> {
> struct xe_device *xe = arg;
>
> if (xe->d3cold.capable)
> sysfs_remove_file(&xe->drm.dev->kobj, &dev_attr_vram_d3cold_threshold.attr);
> +
> + if (xe->info.platform == XE_BATTLEMAGE) {
> + sysfs_remove_file(&xe->drm.dev->kobj, &dev_attr_pcie_gen4_downspeed_capable.attr);
> + sysfs_remove_file(&xe->drm.dev->kobj, &dev_attr_pcie_gen4_downspeed_status.attr);
> + }
> }
>
> int xe_device_sysfs_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> @@ -82,5 +158,15 @@ int xe_device_sysfs_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + if (xe->info.platform == XE_BATTLEMAGE) {
> + ret = sysfs_create_file(&dev->kobj, &dev_attr_pcie_gen4_downspeed_capable.attr);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = sysfs_create_file(&dev->kobj, &dev_attr_pcie_gen4_downspeed_status.attr);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
This should be create_files. If second one fails, none of the other
files are removed.> +
> return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, xe_device_sysfs_fini, xe);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
> index e622ae17f08d..1ea6b2a586ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> #define DGFX_PCODE_STATUS 0x7E
> #define DGFX_GET_INIT_STATUS 0x0
> #define DGFX_INIT_STATUS_COMPLETE 0x1
> +#define DGFX_PCIE4_DOWNSPEED_STATUS REG_BIT(31)PCIE_GEN4
Thanks
Riana>
> #define PCODE_POWER_SETUP 0x7C
> #define POWER_SETUP_SUBCOMMAND_READ_I1 0x4
> @@ -66,6 +67,10 @@
> /* Auxiliary info bits */
> #define AUXINFO_HISTORY_OFFSET REG_GENMASK(31, 29)
>
> +#define BMG_PCIE4_CAP XE_REG(0x138340)
> +#define PCIE4_DOWNSPEED REG_GENMASK(1, 0)
> +#define DOWNSPEED_CAPABLE 2
> +
> struct pcode_err_decode {
> int errno;
> const char *str;
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list