[PATCH 2/3] drm/xe/guc: Use the steering flag when printing registers

[John.C.Harrison at Intel.com]

From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>

The printing code was doing a test on which list a register was in to
decide whether it is steered or not. That might be valid at this
moment but there may be other reasons for extended lists in the
future. Plus, there is a flag specifically for identifying steered
registers. So, just use that instead - it is simpler and safer.

Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
index 9095618648bc..f4b08136e472 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
@@ -1672,18 +1672,16 @@ snapshot_print_by_list_order(struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_
 {
 	struct xe_gt *gt = snapshot->hwe->gt;
 	struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
-	struct xe_guc *guc = &gt->uc.guc;
 	struct xe_devcoredump *devcoredump = &xe->devcoredump;
 	struct xe_devcoredump_snapshot *devcore_snapshot = &devcoredump->snapshot;
 	struct gcap_reg_list_info *reginfo = NULL;
 	u32 i, last_value = 0;
-	bool is_ext, low32_ready = false;
+	bool low32_ready = false;
 
 	if (!list || !list->list || list->num_regs == 0)
 		return;
 	XE_WARN_ON(!devcore_snapshot->matched_node);
 
-	is_ext = list == guc->capture->extlists;
 	reginfo = &devcore_snapshot->matched_node->reginfo[type];
 
 	/*
@@ -1749,7 +1747,7 @@ snapshot_print_by_list_order(struct xe_hw_engine_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_
 			 */
 			XE_WARN_ON(low32_ready);
 
-			if (is_ext) {
+			if (FIELD_GET(GUC_REGSET_STEERING_NEEDED, reg_desc->flags)) {
 				int dss, group, instance;
 
 				group = FIELD_GET(GUC_REGSET_STEERING_GROUP, reg_desc->flags);
-- 
2.49.0