[PATCH v2 17/32] drm/xe/uapi: Add madvise interface

Matthew Brost matthew.brost at intel.com
Tue Apr 22 16:12:36 UTC 2025


On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:02:58AM -0600, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-04-22 at 08:40 -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 12:19:54PM -0600, Souza, Jose wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2025-04-07 at 15:47 +0530, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
> > > > This commit introduces a new madvise interface to support
> > > > driver-specific ioctl operations. The madvise interface allows for more
> > > > efficient memory management by providing hints to the driver about the
> > > > expected memory usage and pte update policy for gpuvma.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray at intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 97 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > > > index 9c08738c3b91..aaf515df3a83 100644
> > > > --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > > > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> > > > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ extern "C" {
> > > >   *  - &DRM_IOCTL_XE_EXEC
> > > >   *  - &DRM_IOCTL_XE_WAIT_USER_FENCE
> > > >   *  - &DRM_IOCTL_XE_OBSERVATION
> > > > + *  - &DRM_IOCTL_XE_MADVISE
> > > >   */
> > > >  
> > > >  /*
> > > > @@ -102,6 +103,7 @@ extern "C" {
> > > >  #define DRM_XE_EXEC			0x09
> > > >  #define DRM_XE_WAIT_USER_FENCE		0x0a
> > > >  #define DRM_XE_OBSERVATION		0x0b
> > > > +#define DRM_XE_MADVISE			0x0c
> > > >  
> > > >  /* Must be kept compact -- no holes */
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -117,6 +119,7 @@ extern "C" {
> > > >  #define DRM_IOCTL_XE_EXEC			DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_XE_EXEC, struct drm_xe_exec)
> > > >  #define DRM_IOCTL_XE_WAIT_USER_FENCE		DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_XE_WAIT_USER_FENCE, struct drm_xe_wait_user_fence)
> > > >  #define DRM_IOCTL_XE_OBSERVATION		DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_XE_OBSERVATION, struct drm_xe_observation_param)
> > > > +#define DRM_IOCTL_XE_MADVISE			DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_XE_MADVISE, struct drm_xe_madvise)
> > > >  
> > > >  /**
> > > >   * DOC: Xe IOCTL Extensions
> > > > @@ -1965,6 +1968,100 @@ struct drm_xe_query_eu_stall {
> > > >  	__u64 sampling_rates[];
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > > +struct drm_xe_madvise_ops {
> > > > +	/** @start: start of the virtual address range */
> > > > +	__u64 start;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/** @size: size of the virtual address range */
> > > > +	__u64 range;
> > > > +
> > > > +#define DRM_XE_VMA_ATTR_PREFERRED_LOC	0
> > > > +#define DRM_XE_VMA_ATTR_ATOMIC		1
> > > > +#define DRM_XE_VMA_ATTR_PAT		2
> > > 
> > > In my opinion we should drop DRM_XE_VMA_ATTR_PAT as we can already change the PAT index by unbinding and binding the VM with the wanted PAT index.
> > > Similar for DRM_XE_VMA_ATTR_ATOMIC and DRM_XE_VMA_ATTR_PREFERRED_LOC, we could have those properties in vm bind uAPI and if needed to change we could
> > > unbind and bind the VMA with the updated attributes.
> > > 
> > 
> > I had thought about making madvise patch of VM bind too. I think it
> > could work but I do think it further complicate an already highly
> > complicated VM bind KMD path. Also the idea with madvise, is it doesn't
> > actually update the GPU page tables rather just the KMD VM/VMA
> > bookkeeping. My prefence here would to be keep this seperate.
> 
> Looks like of those 32 pages 25ish are just refactors to allow madvise support set these attributes, maybe if those were supported in VM bind uAPI it
> would take less changes...
>

Maybe but I honestly doubt it.
 
> > 
> > All of the above attribute are really only intended to be set by
> > faulting VM which Mesa doesn't use.
> 
> We have plans to drop scratch flag from VM in Xe2+ platforms to support a Vulkan extension but that will take some time...
> 

faulting VM != droping scratch page - it means the GPU takes page faults
which are fixed by the KMD. This has a consequence of not allowing
dma-fences (drm syncobjs) so I don't think Mesa will be doing that
anytime soon.

> > 
> > > > +#define DRM_XE_VMA_ATTR_PURGEABLE_STATE	3
> > > 
> > > Mesa can make use of DRM_XE_VMA_ATTR_PURGEABLE_STATE but not the other ones, so you will need other UMDs to land those.
> > > 
> > 
> > I could see Mesa using this one, but again this just flips a bit in KMD
> > internal state - it does touch GPU page tables so would be goofy to
> > implement this in a very complex VM bind IOCTL.
> 
> This one I also don't think it belongs to VM bind uAPI but I did not knew it required a fault VM, we plan to remove the scratch flag from Vulkan
> driver but the usage of this attribute would be in the OpenGL driver, so I don't think we can make use of it then.
> 

This one can be set without a faulting VM - it means when memory
pressure exists and memory is idle, it can purged (not saved) rather
than evicted (saved / restored). Same idea on suspend / resume.

Matt

> > 
> > Matt
> > 
> > > > +	/** @type: type of attribute */
> > > > +	__u32 type;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/** @pad: MBZ */
> > > > +	__u32 pad;
> > > > +
> > > > +	union {
> > > > +		struct {
> > > > +#define DRM_XE_VMA_ATOMIC_UNDEFINED	0
> > > > +#define DRM_XE_VMA_ATOMIC_DEVICE	1
> > > > +#define DRM_XE_VMA_ATOMIC_GLOBAL	2
> > > > +#define DRM_XE_VMA_ATOMIC_CPU		3
> > > > +		/** @val: value of atomic operation*/
> > > > +			__u32 val;
> > > > +
> > > > +		/** @reserved: Reserved */
> > > > +			__u32 reserved;
> > > > +		} atomic;
> > > > +
> > > > +		struct {
> > > > +#define DRM_XE_VMA_PURGEABLE_STATE_WILLNEED	0
> > > > +#define DRM_XE_VMA_PURGEABLE_STATE_DONTNEED	1
> > > > +#define DRM_XE_VMA_PURGEABLE_STATE_PURGED	2
> > > > +		/** @val: value for DRM_XE_VMA_ATTR_PURGEABLE_STATE */
> > > > +			__u32 val;
> > > > +
> > > > +		/** @reserved: Reserved */
> > > > +			__u32 reserved;
> > > > +		} purge_state_val;
> > > > +
> > > > +		struct {
> > > > +			/** @pat_index */
> > > > +			__u32 val;
> > > > +
> > > > +			/** @reserved: Reserved */
> > > > +			__u32 reserved;
> > > > +		} pat_index;
> > > > +
> > > > +		/** @preferred_mem_loc: preferred memory location */
> > > > +		struct {
> > > > +			__u32 devmem_fd;
> > > > +
> > > > +#define MIGRATE_ALL_PAGES 0
> > > > +#define MIGRATE_ONLY_SYSTEM_PAGES 1
> > > > +			__u32 migration_policy;
> > > > +		} preferred_mem_loc;
> > > > +	};
> > > > +
> > > > +	/** @reserved: Reserved */
> > > > +	__u64 reserved[2];
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * struct drm_xe_madvise - Input of &DRM_IOCTL_XE_MADVISE
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Set memory attributes to a virtual address range
> > > > + */
> > > > +struct drm_xe_madvise {
> > > > +	/** @extensions: Pointer to the first extension struct, if any */
> > > > +	__u64 extensions;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/** @vm_id: vm_id of the virtual range */
> > > > +	__u32 vm_id;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/** @num_ops: number of madvises in ioctl */
> > > > +	__u32 num_ops;
> > > > +
> > > > +	union {
> > > > +		/** @ops: used if num_ops == 1 */
> > > > +		struct drm_xe_madvise_ops ops;
> > > > +
> > > > +		/**
> > > > +		 * @vector_of_ops: userptr to array of struct
> > > > +		 * drm_xe_vm_madvise_op if num_ops > 1
> > > > +		 */
> > > > +		__u64 vector_of_ops;
> > > > +	};
> > > > +
> > > > +	/** @reserved: Reserved */
> > > > +	__u64 reserved[2];
> > > > +
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > >  #if defined(__cplusplus)
> > > >  }
> > > >  #endif


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list