[PATCH v8 0/8] drm/xe/vf: Post-migration recovery of queues and jobs

Thomas Hellström thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com
Tue Aug 12 15:55:53 UTC 2025


On Mon, 2025-08-11 at 21:47 -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 03:50:37AM +0200, Tomasz Lis wrote:
> 
> +Maintainers, public, consolidating threads.
> 
> IMO this needs to be fully reverted or at minimum a subset of
> problematic patches, along with [1].
> 
> To start, it was brought to my attention that this code was not
> tested
> due to a lack of internal infrastructure. I believe it is completely
> unacceptable for untested code to be merged, especially for a complex
> feature like this. After spending some time reviewing the feature, I
> found clear bugs, and the overall software architecture appears
> ill-conceived.
> 

Tomasz Lis, Michał Wajdeczko, what type of testing is missing here? Is
the code not tested at all, not even internally or do we lack igts for
this specific functionality?

/Thomas




More information about the Intel-xe mailing list