Switching over to GEM refcounts and a bunch of cleanups

[Christian König]

On 04.08.25 14:24, Christian König wrote:
> On 22.07.25 14:36, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>> Hi, Christian,
>>
>> On Wed, 2025-07-16 at 18:04 +0200, Christian König wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> so I hope Thomas is back from vacation while I will be on vacation
>>> for
>>> the next two weeks.
>>>
>>> Here is the patch set which cleans up TTM and XE in preperation of
>>> switching to drm_exec.
>>>
>>> Please take a look and let me know what you think about it.
>>
>> I'll take a look.
>> BTW Did you see my comments on patch 6/6 on v1, essentially I think
>> both i915 and xe rejecting some TTM callbacks if the object is a zombie
>> (the GEM refcount has reached 0).
> 
> Sorry for the delay I'm just back from vacation.
> 
> I have seen that XE and i915 is checking the GEM refcount, but I haven't seen your comment on that.
> 
> Going to take a look ASAP.

I'm not able to find that mail.

All I've seen is your comment on the VMWGFX stuff and that was already resolved by Zack.

What are you referring to?

Thanks,
Christian.

> 
> Regards,
> Christian.
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>
>