[PATCH v2 11/16] drm/xe: Convert xe_dma_buf.c for exhaustive eviction
Thomas Hellström
thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com
Fri Aug 22 09:40:25 UTC 2025
Convert dma-buf migration to XE_PL_TT and dma-buf import to
support exhaustive eviction, using xe_validation_guard().
It seems unlikely that the import would result in an -ENOMEM,
but convert import anyway for completeness.
The dma-buf map_attachment() functionality unfortunately doesn't
support passing a drm_exec, which means that foreign devices
validating a dma-buf that we exported will not, unless they are
xeKMD devices, participate in the exhaustive eviction scheme.
v2:
- Avoid gotos from within xe_validation_guard(). (Matt Brost)
- Adapt to signature change of xe_validation_guard(). (Matt Brost)
- Remove an unneded (void)ret. (Matt Brost)
- Fix up an error path.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
index 78a827d4e726..3f96101a06f3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
@@ -163,16 +163,26 @@ static int xe_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dma_buf,
struct xe_bo *bo = gem_to_xe_bo(obj);
bool reads = (direction == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL ||
direction == DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
- struct drm_exec *exec = XE_VALIDATION_UNIMPLEMENTED;
+ struct xe_validation_ctx ctx;
+ struct drm_exec exec;
+ int ret = 0;
if (!reads)
return 0;
/* Can we do interruptible lock here? */
- xe_bo_lock(bo, false);
- (void)xe_bo_migrate(bo, XE_PL_TT, exec);
- xe_bo_unlock(bo);
+ xe_validation_guard(&ctx, &xe_bo_device(bo)->val, &exec, (struct xe_val_flags) {}, ret) {
+ ret = drm_exec_lock_obj(&exec, &bo->ttm.base);
+ drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+
+ ret = xe_bo_migrate(bo, XE_PL_TT, &exec);
+ drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec);
+ xe_validation_retry_on_oom(&ctx, &ret);
+ }
+ /* If we failed, cpu-access takes place in current placement. */
return 0;
}
@@ -211,25 +221,36 @@ xe_dma_buf_init_obj(struct drm_device *dev, struct xe_bo *storage,
{
struct dma_resv *resv = dma_buf->resv;
struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(dev);
- struct drm_exec *exec = XE_VALIDATION_UNIMPLEMENTED;
+ struct xe_validation_ctx ctx;
+ struct drm_gem_object *dummy_obj;
+ struct drm_exec exec;
struct xe_bo *bo;
- int ret;
-
- dma_resv_lock(resv, NULL);
- bo = ___xe_bo_create_locked(xe, storage, NULL, resv, NULL, dma_buf->size,
- 0, /* Will require 1way or 2way for vm_bind */
- ttm_bo_type_sg, XE_BO_FLAG_SYSTEM, exec);
- if (IS_ERR(bo)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(bo);
- goto error;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ dummy_obj = drm_gpuvm_resv_object_alloc(&xe->drm);
+ if (!dummy_obj)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ dummy_obj->resv = resv;
+ xe_validation_guard(&ctx, &xe->val, &exec, (struct xe_val_flags) {}, ret) {
+ ret = drm_exec_lock_obj(&exec, dummy_obj);
+ drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+
+ bo = ___xe_bo_create_locked(xe, storage, NULL, resv, NULL, dma_buf->size,
+ 0, /* Will require 1way or 2way for vm_bind */
+ ttm_bo_type_sg, XE_BO_FLAG_SYSTEM, &exec);
+ drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec);
+ if (IS_ERR(bo)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(bo);
+ xe_validation_retry_on_oom(&ctx, &ret);
+ break;
+ }
}
- dma_resv_unlock(resv);
-
- return &bo->ttm.base;
+ drm_gem_object_put(dummy_obj);
-error:
- dma_resv_unlock(resv);
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ return ret ? ERR_PTR(ret) : &bo->ttm.base;
}
static void xe_dma_buf_move_notify(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
--
2.50.1
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list