[PATCH v4 1/2] drm/xe: Add Wa_16021333562 and Wa_14016712196
Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Tue Feb 18 16:20:55 UTC 2025
+Daniele
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 05:59:38AM +0000, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
>Wa_16021333562 and Wa_14016712196 are permanent workarounds that apply
>to multiple platforms. Wa_16021333562 applies to platforms ranging from
>TGL (12.00) to Xe_LPM (13.00), while Wa_14016712196 from DG2 (12.55) to
>Xe_LPG (12.74).
>
>Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia at intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c | 4 ++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
>index fab259adc380..e7c9e095a19f 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
>@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static void guc_waklv_init(struct xe_guc_ads *ads)
> offset = guc_ads_waklv_offset(ads);
> remain = guc_ads_waklv_size(ads);
>
>- if (XE_WA(gt, 14019882105))
>+ if (XE_WA(gt, 14019882105) || XE_WA(gt, 16021333562))
> guc_waklv_enable_simple(ads,
> GUC_WORKAROUND_KLV_BLOCK_INTERRUPTS_WHEN_MGSR_BLOCKED,
> &offset, &remain);
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
>index 9f327f27c072..29cd7b548493 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
>@@ -192,6 +192,10 @@ static int emit_render_cache_flush(struct xe_sched_job *job, u32 *dw, int i)
> else if (job->q->class == XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE)
> flags &= ~PIPE_CONTROL_3D_ENGINE_FLAGS;
>
>+ if (XE_WA(gt, 14016712196))
>+ i = emit_pipe_control(dw, i, 0, PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH,
>+ LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR, 0);
this has a build time conflict with commit f0c06677d110 ("drm/xe/pxp:
Add VCS inline termination support"). AFAICS it should be renamed to
LRC_PPHWSP_FLUSH_INVAL_SCRATCH_ADDR, right?
Looking at the impl, it seems we should also move it earlier, so:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
index eec623ed0f562..839a19aa46f46 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
@@ -177,6 +177,10 @@ static int emit_render_cache_flush(struct xe_sched_job *job, u32 *dw, int i)
bool lacks_render = !(gt->info.engine_mask & XE_HW_ENGINE_RCS_MASK);
u32 flags;
+ if (XE_WA(gt, 14016712196))
+ i = emit_pipe_control(dw, i, 0, PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH,
+ LRC_PPHWSP_FLUSH_INVAL_SCRATCH_ADDR, 0);
+
flags = (PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL |
PIPE_CONTROL_TILE_CACHE_FLUSH |
PIPE_CONTROL_RENDER_TARGET_CACHE_FLUSH |
@@ -192,10 +196,6 @@ static int emit_render_cache_flush(struct xe_sched_job *job, u32 *dw, int i)
else if (job->q->class == XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE)
flags &= ~PIPE_CONTROL_3D_ENGINE_FLAGS;
- if (XE_WA(gt, 14016712196))
- i = emit_pipe_control(dw, i, 0, PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH,
- LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR, 0);
-
return emit_pipe_control(dw, i, PIPE_CONTROL0_HDC_PIPELINE_FLUSH, flags, 0, 0);
}
because of the rename and all the other flags and calculations are about the last
emit_pipe_control(), not this one we are adding.
Lucas De Marchi
>+
> return emit_pipe_control(dw, i, PIPE_CONTROL0_HDC_PIPELINE_FLUSH, flags, 0, 0);
> }
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
>index 228436532282..ea72bcc02e1e 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa_oob.rules
>@@ -43,3 +43,7 @@
> no_media_l3 MEDIA_VERSION(3000)
> 14022866841 GRAPHICS_VERSION(3000), GRAPHICS_STEP(A0, B0)
> MEDIA_VERSION(3000), MEDIA_STEP(A0, B0)
>+16021333562 GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(1200, 1274)
>+ MEDIA_VERSION(1300)
>+14016712196 GRAPHICS_VERSION(1255)
>+ GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(1270, 1274)
>--
>2.45.2
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list