[bug report] drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs
Dan Carpenter
dan.carpenter at linaro.org
Wed Feb 19 09:29:13 UTC 2025
Hello Matthew Brost,
Commit dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel
GPUs") from Mar 30, 2023 (linux-next), leads to the following Smatch
static checker warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c:1241 xe_guc_suspend() warn: passing possitive error code '(-110),(-71),(-6),1-268435455' to 'ERR_PTR'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c:698 intel_guc_suspend() warn: passing non-max range '1-268435455' to 'ERR_PTR'
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
1231 int xe_guc_suspend(struct xe_guc *guc)
1232 {
1233 struct xe_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
1234 u32 action[] = {
1235 XE_GUC_ACTION_CLIENT_SOFT_RESET,
1236 };
1237 int ret;
1238
1239 ret = xe_guc_mmio_send(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
The xe_guc_mmio_send() function returns this:
1388 /* Use data from the GuC response as our return value */
1389 return FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_RESPONSE_MSG_0_DATA0, header);
All we know about it is that it's a positive number between 0-0xfffffff.
1240 if (ret) {
--> 1241 xe_gt_err(gt, "GuC suspend failed: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
^^^
passing positives to ERR_PTR() is verboten.
1242 return ret;
1243 }
1244
1245 xe_guc_sanitize(guc);
1246 return 0;
1247 }
regards,
dan carpenter
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list