[PATCH v2 4/5] drm/xe/kunit: Update RTP tests with SR-IOV rules

[Michal Wajdeczko]

On 24.02.2025 23:55, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 04:06:59PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>> Add more test cases that verifies use of RTP SRIOV() rules in
>> driver running as native, PF and VF mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
>> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 111 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.c
>> index 36a3b5420fef..b21474df933e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.c
>> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ struct rtp_to_sr_test_case {
>>  struct rtp_test_case {
>>  	const char *name;
>>  	unsigned long expected_active;
>> +	unsigned long expected_active_pf;
>> +	unsigned long expected_active_vf;
>>  	const struct xe_rtp_entry *entries;
>>  };
>>  
>> @@ -469,6 +471,89 @@ static const struct rtp_test_case rtp_cases[] = {
>>  	},
>>  };
>>  
>> +static const struct rtp_test_case sriov_cases[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		.name = "non_vf",
>> +		.expected_active = BIT(0) | BIT(1),
>> +		.expected_active_pf = BIT(0) | BIT(1),
>> +		.expected_active_vf = 0,
>> +		.entries = (const struct xe_rtp_entry[]) {
>> +			{ XE_RTP_NAME("and"),
>> +			  XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes)),
>> +			},
>> +			{ XE_RTP_NAME("or"),
>> +			  XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_no), OR,
>> +				       FUNC(match_yes)),
>> +			},
>> +			{}
>> +		},
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.name = "vf_ready",
>> +		.expected_active = BIT(0) | BIT(1),
>> +		.expected_active_pf = BIT(0) | BIT(1),
>> +		.expected_active_vf = BIT(0) | BIT(1),
>> +		.entries = (const struct xe_rtp_entry[]) {
>> +			{ XE_RTP_NAME("and"),
>> +			  XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes), SRIOV(VF_READY)),
>> +			},
>> +			{ XE_RTP_NAME("or"),
>> +			  XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_no), OR,
>> +				       FUNC(match_yes), SRIOV(VF_READY)),
>> +			},
>> +			{}
>> +		},
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.name = "vf_only",
>> +		.expected_active = 0,
>> +		.expected_active_pf = 0,
>> +		.expected_active_vf = BIT(0) | BIT(1),
>> +		.entries = (const struct xe_rtp_entry[]) {
>> +			{ XE_RTP_NAME("and"),
>> +			  XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes), SRIOV(VF_ONLY)),
>> +			},
>> +			{ XE_RTP_NAME("or"),
>> +			  XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_no), OR,
>> +				       FUNC(match_yes), SRIOV(VF_ONLY)),
>> +			},
>> +			{}
>> +		},
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.name = "pf_only",
>> +		.expected_active = 0,
>> +		.expected_active_pf = BIT(0) | BIT(1),
>> +		.expected_active_vf = 0,
>> +		.entries = (const struct xe_rtp_entry[]) {
>> +			{ XE_RTP_NAME("and"),
>> +			  XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes), SRIOV(PF_ONLY)),
>> +			},
>> +			{ XE_RTP_NAME("or"),
>> +			  XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_no), OR,
>> +				       FUNC(match_yes), SRIOV(PF_ONLY)),
>> +			},
>> +			{}
>> +		},
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.name = "sriov_only",
>> +		.expected_active = 0,
>> +		.expected_active_pf = BIT(0) | BIT(1),
>> +		.expected_active_vf = BIT(0) | BIT(1),
>> +		.entries = (const struct xe_rtp_entry[]) {
>> +			{ XE_RTP_NAME("and"),
>> +			  XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes), SRIOV(ONLY)),
>> +			},
>> +			{ XE_RTP_NAME("or"),
>> +			  XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_no), OR,
>> +				       FUNC(match_yes), SRIOV(ONLY)),
>> +			},
>> +			{}
>> +		},
>> +	},
>> +};
>> +
>>  static void xe_rtp_process_tests(struct kunit *test)
>>  {
>>  	const struct rtp_test_case *param = test->param_value;
>> @@ -483,7 +568,28 @@ static void xe_rtp_process_tests(struct kunit *test)
>>  	xe_rtp_process_ctx_enable_active_tracking(&ctx, &active, count_rtp_entries);
>>  	xe_rtp_process(&ctx, param->entries);
>>  
>> -	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, active, param->expected_active);
>> +	if (IS_SRIOV_PF(xe))
> 
> The xe here is a mock device (from drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device).
> Won't these SRIOV tests require something extra in
> xe_pci_fake_device_init() to ever be SRIOV-enabled?  Or am I overlooking
> something?

yes ;)

see xe_rtp_process_tests_{pf,vf} below, where we convert mock xe to be
PF or VF by explicitly altering xe->sriov.__mode

> 
> 
> Matt
> 
> 
>> +		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, active, param->expected_active_pf);
>> +	else if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
>> +		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, active, param->expected_active_vf);
>> +	else
>> +		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, active, param->expected_active);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void xe_rtp_process_tests_pf(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_device *xe = test->priv;
>> +
>> +	xe->sriov.__mode = XE_SRIOV_MODE_PF;
>> +	xe_rtp_process_tests(test);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void xe_rtp_process_tests_vf(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_device *xe = test->priv;
>> +
>> +	xe->sriov.__mode = XE_SRIOV_MODE_VF;
>> +	xe_rtp_process_tests(test);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void rtp_to_sr_desc(const struct rtp_to_sr_test_case *t, char *desc)
>> @@ -499,6 +605,7 @@ static void rtp_desc(const struct rtp_test_case *t, char *desc)
>>  }
>>  
>>  KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(rtp, rtp_cases, rtp_desc);
>> +KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(sriov, sriov_cases, rtp_desc);
>>  
>>  static int xe_rtp_test_init(struct kunit *test)
>>  {
>> @@ -533,6 +640,9 @@ static void xe_rtp_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
>>  static struct kunit_case xe_rtp_tests[] = {
>>  	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(xe_rtp_process_to_sr_tests, rtp_to_sr_gen_params),
>>  	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(xe_rtp_process_tests, rtp_gen_params),
>> +	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(xe_rtp_process_tests, sriov_gen_params),
>> +	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(xe_rtp_process_tests_pf, sriov_gen_params),
>> +	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(xe_rtp_process_tests_vf, sriov_gen_params),
>>  	{}
>>  };
>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.47.1
>>
>