[PATCH 1/3] drm/xe/pf: Use GuC Buffer Cache during policy provisioning
Michal Wajdeczko
michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Wed Jan 22 21:49:53 UTC 2025
Start using GuC buffer cache for the SRIOV policy configuration
actions. This is a required step before we could declare SRIOV
PF as being a reclaim safe.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.c | 50 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.c
index c00fb354705f..4445f660e6d1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_helpers.h"
#include "xe_gt_sriov_pf_policy.h"
#include "xe_gt_sriov_printk.h"
+#include "xe_guc_buf.h"
#include "xe_guc_ct.h"
#include "xe_guc_klv_helpers.h"
#include "xe_pm.h"
@@ -34,48 +35,28 @@ static int guc_action_update_vgt_policy(struct xe_guc *guc, u64 addr, u32 size)
* Return: number of KLVs that were successfully parsed and saved,
* negative error code on failure.
*/
-static int pf_send_policy_klvs(struct xe_gt *gt, const u32 *klvs, u32 num_dwords)
+static int pf_send_policy_klvs(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_guc_buf buf, u32 num_dwords)
{
- const u32 bytes = num_dwords * sizeof(u32);
- struct xe_tile *tile = gt_to_tile(gt);
- struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(tile);
struct xe_guc *guc = >->uc.guc;
- struct xe_bo *bo;
- int ret;
- bo = xe_bo_create_pin_map(xe, tile, NULL,
- ALIGN(bytes, PAGE_SIZE),
- ttm_bo_type_kernel,
- XE_BO_FLAG_VRAM_IF_DGFX(tile) |
- XE_BO_FLAG_GGTT);
- if (IS_ERR(bo))
- return PTR_ERR(bo);
-
- xe_map_memcpy_to(xe, &bo->vmap, 0, klvs, bytes);
-
- ret = guc_action_update_vgt_policy(guc, xe_bo_ggtt_addr(bo), num_dwords);
-
- xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm(bo);
-
- return ret;
+ return guc_action_update_vgt_policy(guc, xe_guc_buf_flush(buf), num_dwords);
}
/*
* Return: 0 on success, -ENOKEY if some KLVs were not updated, -EPROTO if reply was malformed,
* negative error code on failure.
*/
-static int pf_push_policy_klvs(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 num_klvs,
- const u32 *klvs, u32 num_dwords)
+static int pf_push_policy_buf_klvs(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 num_klvs,
+ struct xe_guc_buf buf, u32 num_dwords)
{
int ret;
- xe_gt_assert(gt, num_klvs == xe_guc_klv_count(klvs, num_dwords));
-
- ret = pf_send_policy_klvs(gt, klvs, num_dwords);
+ ret = pf_send_policy_klvs(gt, buf, num_dwords);
if (ret != num_klvs) {
int err = ret < 0 ? ret : ret < num_klvs ? -ENOKEY : -EPROTO;
struct drm_printer p = xe_gt_info_printer(gt);
+ void *klvs = xe_guc_buf_cpu_ptr(buf);
xe_gt_sriov_notice(gt, "Failed to push %u policy KLV%s (%pe)\n",
num_klvs, str_plural(num_klvs), ERR_PTR(err));
@@ -86,6 +67,23 @@ static int pf_push_policy_klvs(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 num_klvs,
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * Return: 0 on success, -ENOBUFS if there is no free buffer for the indirect data,
+ * negative error code on failure.
+ */
+static int pf_push_policy_klvs(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 num_klvs,
+ const u32 *klvs, u32 num_dwords)
+{
+ CLASS(xe_guc_buf_from_data, buf)(>->uc.guc.buf, klvs, num_dwords * sizeof(u32));
+
+ xe_gt_assert(gt, num_klvs == xe_guc_klv_count(klvs, num_dwords));
+
+ if (!xe_guc_buf_is_valid(buf))
+ return -ENOBUFS;
+
+ return pf_push_policy_buf_klvs(gt, num_klvs, buf, num_dwords);
+}
+
static int pf_push_policy_u32(struct xe_gt *gt, u16 key, u32 value)
{
u32 klv[] = {
--
2.47.1
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list