[PATCH i-g-t] runner: Relax timeout reduction on soft lockup
Kamil Konieczny
kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com
Mon Jul 7 08:54:24 UTC 2025
Hi Janusz,
On 2025-07-04 at 15:30:35 +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> In case of soft lockups, it might be helpful from root cause analysis
> perspective to see if the test was still able to complete despite
> triggering the soft lockup warning, or if that soft lockup seems not
> recoverable without killing the test. For that to be possible, igt_runner
> should not kill the test too promptly if a soft lockup related kernel
> taint is detected.
>
> On kernel taints, igt_runner now decreases per test and inactivity
> timeouts by a factor of 10. Let it check if the taint is caused by a
> soft lockup and decrease the timeouts only by the factor of 2 in those
> cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> runner/executor.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/runner/executor.c b/runner/executor.c
> index 13180a0a46..de9d29d28d 100644
> --- a/runner/executor.c
> +++ b/runner/executor.c
> @@ -871,10 +871,14 @@ static const char *need_to_timeout(struct settings *settings,
> if (settings->abort_mask & ABORT_TAINT &&
> is_tainted(taints)) {
> /* list of timeouts that may postpone immediate kill on taint */
> - if (settings->per_test_timeout || settings->inactivity_timeout)
> - decrease = 10;
> - else
> + if (settings->per_test_timeout || settings->inactivity_timeout) {
> + if (is_tainted(taints) == (1 << 9) && taints & (1 << 14))
Looks reasonable, imho there should be #define or constants
for those (1 << 9) and (1 << 14), at least for these and maybe
also other bits.
Regards,
Kamil
> + decrease = 2; /* only warn + soft lockup */
> + else
> + decrease = 10;
> + } else {
> return "Killing the test because the kernel is tainted.\n";
> + }
> }
>
> if (settings->per_test_timeout != 0 &&
> @@ -1526,8 +1530,9 @@ static int monitor_output(pid_t child,
> sigfd = -1; /* we are dying, no signal handling for now */
> }
>
> + igt_kernel_tainted(&taints);
> timeout_reason = need_to_timeout(settings, killed,
> - igt_kernel_tainted(&taints),
> + taints,
> igt_time_elapsed(&time_last_activity, &time_now),
> igt_time_elapsed(&time_last_subtest, &time_now),
> igt_time_elapsed(&time_killed, &time_now),
> --
> 2.50.0
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list