[PATCH] drm/xe/migrate: fix copy direction in access_memory

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Thu Jul 10 20:04:39 UTC 2025


On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 10:22:47AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 02:41:29PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
>> After we do the modification on the host side, ensure we write the
>> result back to VRAM and not the other way around, otherwise the
>> modification will be lost if treated like a read.
>>
>> Fixes: 270172f64b11 ("drm/xe: Update xe_ttm_access_memory to use GPU for non-visible access")
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
>
>Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
>> index 4e2bdf70eb70..2adf95d35c31 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
>> @@ -1848,7 +1848,7 @@ int xe_migrate_access_memory(struct xe_migrate *m, struct xe_bo *bo,
>>  				err = xe_migrate_access_memory(m, bo,
>>  							       offset & ~XE_CACHELINE_MASK,
>>  							       (void *)ptr,
>> -							       sizeof(bounce), 0);
>> +							       sizeof(bounce), write);

pass by comment... isn't the check for alignment above this snippet also
wrong? This one:

	/* Use bounce buffer for small access and unaligned access */
	if (len & XE_CACHELINE_MASK ||
	    ((uintptr_t)buf | offset) & XE_CACHELINE_MASK) {

We have:

	XE_CACHELINE_MASK == 0x3f

and supposing:

	buf == 0xffffffff1234563f
	offset == 1
	len == XE_CACHELINE_BYTES

this would go through the small/unaligned access, but it's actually
aligned: we are copying XE_CACHELINE_BYTES from 0xffffffff12345640.

I guess we wanted this instead?

	if (len & XE_CACHELINE_MASK ||
	    ((unsigned long)buf + offset) & XE_CACHELINE_MASK)

or even:

	if (!IS_ALIGNED(len, XE_CACHELINE_BYTES) ||
	    !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)buf + offset, XE_CACHELINE_BYTES))

Lucas De Marchi

>>  				if (err)
>>  					return err;
>>  			} else {
>> --
>> 2.50.0
>>


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list