[PATCH] drm/xe/migrate: Fix alignment check
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Fri Jul 11 08:46:42 UTC 2025
On 10/07/2025 22:34, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> The check would fail if the address is unaligned, but not when
> accounting the offset. Instead of `buf | offset` it should have
> been `buf + offset`. To make it more readable and also drop the
> uintptr_t, just use the IS_ALIGNED() macro.
>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> index 4e2bdf70eb70b..18b53a4e267d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> @@ -1817,8 +1817,8 @@ int xe_migrate_access_memory(struct xe_migrate *m, struct xe_bo *bo,
> xe_bo_assert_held(bo);
>
> /* Use bounce buffer for small access and unaligned access */
> - if (len & XE_CACHELINE_MASK ||
> - ((uintptr_t)buf | offset) & XE_CACHELINE_MASK) {
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(len, XE_CACHELINE_BYTES) ||
> + !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)buf + offset, XE_CACHELINE_BYTES)) {
> int buf_offset = 0;
>
> /*
>
>
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list